User talk:Lolametro

Welcome!
Hello, Lolametro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 07:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

In response to your feedback
Yeah, it is at first. Try looking at this primer for some help. No need to read all of it, just the stuff that's relevant to what you want to do.

I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
What is "too complicated"?

Tito Dutta ✉ 14:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * It's very hard to learn how to edit the Wikipedia. You must learn a lot of shortcodes etc. and formatting content is (for me) impossible. A Wordpress Editor or sth like that would be really nice! Thank you --Lolametro (talk) 16:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It is not very difficult too and I am seeing you are doing quite well. You can see Cheatsheet. Let me know if you have any question! --Tito Dutta ✉ 16:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Windows Phone 8. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Windows Phone 8. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Codename Lisa (talk) 14:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.