User talk:Lolitaaaa91748192

June 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kidda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. ''A prod notice can not be replaced. To delete the option is WP:AFD'' Atlantic306 (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

why you reverted my nominations from deletetion? this what you are making is vandalism i'm just clear this page because it haves multiple issues since a long time. I'm gonna nominat it again - because you're not following the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayeziu (talk • contribs)


 * Ayeziu, you cannot restore WP:PROD templates once they are contested. Your reverts are disruptive, please stop.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Kidda
Do not readd the Proposed deletion tag to Kidda. If you think the article should be deleted you will need to nominate it using the WP:AFD process. If you click that last link it will explain how to nominate it. If you need assistance please ask. ~ GB fan 18:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KIDDA


The article KIDDA has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 07:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KIDDA


A tag has been placed on KIDDA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.towrecords.com/biographie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 09:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)