User talk:Lom Konkreta

Welcome! 11ka9SS7FI Hello, Lom Konkreta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Ghirla-трёп- 16:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Kholmsk
Not a problem. If there's ever anything you think I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. Cheers and welcome,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 21, 2010; 15:09 (UTC)

Gavril and Gavriil
Where did you move the content from and  to? I cannot find it in the page you've redirected to. — Hebrides (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I replied to you on my talk page to facilitate continuity :) — Hebrides (talk) 09:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod for deletion
The article Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Novgorodsko-Sofiysky Svod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Snotty Wong  confabulate 22:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Natalie Glebova
Dear Lom Konkreta, Your recent edit # 00:30, 10 August 2011 (diff | hist) Natalie Glebova ‎ contains spelling errors: She studied classical piano and raduated from... She eigrated to Toronto...

Please correct the errors.

Also, in her biography, Natalie Glebova refers her place of birth as Russia which is acceptable name for the country according to Wikipedia. Recently, there is a rise of editing war changing the name of Russia to Soviet Union. The country name Russia existed centuries before, it was PART of USSR as Russian Federation (or Russia), and it is Russia now. I believe that the country name should be left unchanged as it was referred originally on this page and as Natalie Glebova mentioned it in her biography Biography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.135.100 (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No matter what you or she say, she was born in RSFSR, Soviet Union. I understand that it was commonly called "Russia" (even Armenians and Uzbeks were called "Russians" during the Cold War.) But the encyclopedia must be exact in detail in formal places. Of course, throughout the prose of the article it is OK to say that she lived in Russia, left Russia, visited Russia, etc. Lom Konkreta (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As for errors, I find it ...er... strange for you to spend so much time to rub my face into it when you could have typed 2-3 letters right in the text. Lom Konkreta (talk)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Kitay-gorod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
ZZArch talk to me 10:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Autojetter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transformers universe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foolish Guys ... to Confound the Wise. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Please do not edit my comments, as you did here. That puts words in my mouth that I did not say. Thanks.'' Epeefleche (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Huh? Lom Konkreta (talk) 02:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. But you edited the text preceding my signature.  That makes it appear as though I had said things that I most certainly did not say.  And would not have said.  I would hope you would understand how that might be disconcerting to an editor in my position.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Endless Steppe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sibiryak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Institute for Basic Research for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute for Basic Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Institute for Basic Research (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grrahnbahr (talk • contribs) 14:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)