User talk:Londium

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 02:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

WPTR Invitation
{VikiProje Türkiye'ye davet / Invitation to join WikiProject Turkey


 * My response can be found here User_talk:Denizz Lo Nd Iu M    Speak to meContributions  —The preceding  signed but undated.

As far as I know, we are in need of copyeditors. If you want to, please do copyedit WPTR and WPKU articles and make other improvements, as well. Whaever you'd like. Thanks a lot. DenizTC 03:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

WHY HAVE I BEEN BLOCKED.
I logged on today and found out that I've been indefinitely blocked. I am not this person: (User:AdilBaguirov); I have never seen or heard of that person. I have emailed the administrator who blocked me (User:Alex Bakharev) twice now and have yet to even receive a response. So I am forced to request an unblocking to clear my name and so I can be reintegrated back into the wikipedia community. Lo Nd Iu M   Speak to meContributions


 * I have asked the blocking admin to comment. Please bear with us. Spartaz Humbug! 06:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I think the editor should be given a second chance following his/her promise:""If unblocked I promise not to edit any kind of disputed article and will make sure I balance everything in my writings. I also promise to use the talk page more. Better still I wont touch any article that is outside of England and Britain! I think the only crime I've done was being in the wrong place at the wrong time.""

It seems to me that this ban was based on 'gut feeling', which can be sometimes useful. My 'gut feeling' is opposite to the 3 admins here. 3 admins agreeing on a ban must be something assuming there is no 'kinship of admins'. Why do I have this opposite 'gut feeling'? First, different interests (check vs, only intersection possibly the list of iranic states article). Second different perspective (Iranian Azeri vs Turkish sympathizer, Iranian Azeri was an assumption, I am not so familiar with user:adibaguirov). Third, contributions, Londium's only major edit on the list of Iranic states article was removing the 'Turkic empires' there following his comments on the talk page. Last but not least, his unblock requests here, which gave me the impression that he is not a sockpuppet. Anyway, imo the worst that should be done to this editor was banning him/her from the 'Iranic' articles, certainly not banning completely, and the editor agreed to not do anything with those articles, and to be a 'good kid', anyway. He should be able to 'touch' non-British articles as well. DenizTC 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 18:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality Project
Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Jame§ugrono 08:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello. You may have seen that some Wikipedia articles lack sources to given dates, timelines and chronologies. If you feel that you could like to help in making all articles more reliable and well sourced in this regard, we would like to encourage you to use, as part of your daily editing and when fact is not enough for requesting clearly and specifically a citation or source for dates, timeline or chronology, the following inline tag:
 * Timefact displays {chronology source needed} for requesting timelines, dates and chronology sources. Click  here for more information

At WP Timeline Tracer, we thank you for using these tools and for helping to make Wikipedia articles more accurate and reliable.  Dao  ken  11:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

coordinator election
The Wikiproject History is going to elect 3 coordinators. As a member you are invited to participate. Wandalstouring (talk) 10:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

WP Computing
Greetings. You are receiving this note as you are a member of this WikiProject. Currently there is not much of activity in the project and I am hoping to revive the project with your help. I have made a few changes to the project page Diff. You are welcome to make suggestions of improvement / changes in the design. I have also make a proposal to AutoTagg articles with WikiProject Computing for the descendant wikiprojects articles also. Please express your opinion here --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 12:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)