User talk:London15

Regarding edits made during January 23 2007 (UTC) to Power Rangers
Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. — Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 19:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

¡DETENTE POR FAVOR! No va a ser una serie de Power Rangers llamada «Power Rangers: Planet Force.» La serie «Gekiranger» no usa una tema de las planetas y no hay información sobre la serie inglesa por el año 2008 en los Estados Unidos. No menciones por favor una serie que no existe.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 19:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I apologize if you are not Spanish speaking, but because an anonymous editor from Chile did the same edits, I have to assume such.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 19:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced edits at Operation Overdrive
Please do not insert information that is not reliably sourced into the article. The only reliable sources are the cast members' websites, Disney's websites, or press releases. All of your additions had no source. If you continue, you may be blocked for disrupting Wikipedia.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 02:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Rhoda Montemayor
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Nardman1 19:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rhoda Montemayor
An editor has nominated Rhoda Montemayor, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 10:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

PROO
Please do not flood the article with trivia, unsourced speculation, and other information that we cannot support by an attributable source.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 21:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Images
Television screenshots, like those you had at Operation Overdrive Power Rangers are not licensable under the GFDL. They are fair use screenshots.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 20:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Block
I have indefinitely blocked you for your constant violations of copyright, Verifiability, Reliable sources, and generally not discussing anything with anyone. If you want to appeal this block, use. Wikipedia does not take kindly to people who persistantly violate copyright.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 20:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Carol Hoyt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carol Hoyt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carol Hoyt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 05:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Rhoda Montemayor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhoda Montemayor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rhoda Montemayor& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)