User talk:LondonQuays

hi

Your GA nomination of My First Album (Peppa Pig album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My First Album (Peppa Pig album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please stop edit warring and self-revert as a consensus is still being built. You are coming close to violating WP:3RR.


 * First change of infobox type to unspecified "Album"
 * Revert
 * Revert
 * Again, revert

Again, please self-revert and continue discussing at the talk page. I recently listed many sources referring to the album as a soundtrack album, including Beyoncé herself, so it'd make sense to revert the infobox as it was and only change it once a consensus is reached. "Album" may seem neutral to you, but your editing is still considered disruptive whether you're "right" or not. (Also, the infobox looks broken when you forget to change the template type for the singles.) Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * @Nice4What: Can you provide a diff/old version that shows that the first revert listed above is in fact a revert and not a bold edit? —C.Fred (talk) 17:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * May be considered a bold edit rather than a first revert. I just meant that he had reverted the album type being changed by another editor. I'll update what I wrote. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:12, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My First Album (Peppa Pig album)
The article My First Album (Peppa Pig album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:My First Album (Peppa Pig album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adele, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Monica Lewinsky. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 21:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Sock accounts and sleepers

 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's certainly a master account but it's not worth the time or effort to dig further per WP:DENY.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Wow, good find, good job.  -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dan Burton (disambiguation) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dan Burton (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Burton (disambiguation) has been accepted
 Dan Burton (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 23:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Dan_Burton_(disambiguation) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your draft article, Draft:Sam Qualie


Hello, LondonQuays. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sam Qualie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)