User talk:Londonchildrensb

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines.

Contributions to other topics?
Hi London Children's Ballet,

Do you mind if I call you "Ballet"? I hope not. I see from your username that you have a strong interest in the LCB, which is certainly laudable, but it would be quite a pity if your only motivation to edit Wikipedia were to promote an organisation in which you have a vested interest. In fact, to the Wikipedia community, this is a strong cause for concern, as it might cloud your judgement regarding the notability of the topic, or even lead to a lack of objectivity. As a person with a strong interest in the performing arts, maybe you could find some other articles which pique your interest and see whether they are complete and correct? See for example the articles listed under Category:Ballet_in_the_United_Kingdom. Happy editing! --Slashme (talk) 12:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Slashme (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The London Children's Ballet article
Hi! I saw the LCB article, and it looks like it has an opportunity to be a great article if it has some references added. Since you appear from your chosen user name to be either related to the organization or a big supporter of it, would you happen to have access to newspaper or magazine articles about the ballet company that we can use to put references into the article? I'd like to help make the article as good as it can be. While Wikipedia discourages people who are related to an organization or person from writing about that organization or person, it's encouraged for someone related to the organization to put forward good information sources that can be used by other editors to improve an article. You can reply either here on your talk page or on my talk page, and I'll see it the next time I log in. Brilliant Pebble (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, there are two online magazine and newspaper articles about London Children's Ballet!Here are the links:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/05/04/sv_childrenballet.xml

http://www.ballet.co.uk/magazines/yr_07/jun07/gw_rev_london_childrens_0507.html

thanks! --Londonchildrensb (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)londonchildrensb

User:Londonchildrensb
A tag has been placed on on your user page, User:Londonchildrensb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam and the guidelines on user pages.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 22:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)