User talk:Long Arm

It's unfortunate that you feel you have the ability to make decisions on material which you have little or no knowledge of. I would hope that the Wikipedia folks and/or the other users would realize that allowing only one person, such as yourself, the ability to make decisions to keep or delete information is a great injustice to the readers and only jeopordizes the quality of this site. Best of luck in your future decisions pertaining to items you have no knowledge of!

Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -FisherQueen 19:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Ms. or Mr. Queen, Talk about your computer hackers! I've reviewed various responses to The Fisherqueen's recent editing exploits. It's surprising how little The Fisherqueen knows about the material he/she comments and purges. The fact that this person, or any are allowed to delete articles that have been submitted by others. The Fisherqueen might want to concentrate on areas or items that he/she actually knows about! Oh well, articles and other pieces of interest that the public would find useful, are being dleted by a Queen!Since this doesn't promote the Fisherqueen, I'm sure he/she will use their new power to delete it!