User talk:Longhair/Archive18

Aussie films
Sorry but what part of "Note: for convenience ALL Australian films are included in this category" didn't you understand? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦      "Talk"? 17:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know about the whole discussion and I'm sure you were trying to do something good by splitting Aussie films by genre, but, there is a long running precedent of not having films by country subdivided into genre because it is considered useful to have all films in their country category. If you want to change this you will need discuss it and get consensus for your changes. gren グレン 08:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Ouch. Some civility would go a long way guys - this is one of our most productive and active contributors. Orderinchaos 13:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL - indeed! Mind you, there's a sillier, but somewhat more harmless, discussion taking place at Talk:List of cities in Australia. Orderinchaos 22:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Aussie films
Hi Longhair sorry if you have been offended by any of this. The thing is nobody was doubting your credibility as a wikipedian and your good intentions -it was wrong of some of your project members to bring your edit count into the equation. I am not pleased with some of their responses to this (with the exception of SatuSuro who has been very reasonable) but whats done is done. With films though it happened to come into conflict with the category system by country where I guess we are trying to keep some consistency. There are as I see only some 250 -300 films from Australia currently on wikipedia which means only a page and a half for the category -as yet I think it is easier to file them A-Z in one category -it makes browsing more simplified. I as I said can also see the idea of by genre, I tried to do the same with the American films a while back which (is a huge category)!! but I was met with fierce reaction to my changes also. I was eventually persuaded that simplifying is better in regard to films. All the best  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 07:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Partners in Crime

 * The language is strongly reminiscent of our Gundagai friend. For the life of me though I am not sure what I have written that qualifies as defamation - I even appealed the deletion of his article as not non-notable - surely the opposite of defamation - famation?.  But anyone who thinks that all 20+ million Australians know each other even if they live a few hundred miles apart has a few problems!  :-) Regards --Golden Wattle  talk 20:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Australian biota template
Hi longhair

I noticed you added an Australian biota template to the Southern black bream article. Does this imply that all Australian (both endemic and widespread) fish species should be tagged with such a template? If this is the case, I'm sure i can help you with this if you would like, as i'm slowly trying to bring Australia's popular angling species up to at least GA status.

Cheers Kare Kare 10:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

unreferenced on Air-to-surface missile
So what exactly would you like to see referenced? Most of the article is basic information about it, which anyone with an interest in them can basically think of on their own. - Dammit 19:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Respost to Longhair
Nice to meet too Longhair. I speak bit of English, know of any user binlíngue (Portuguese/English)? I hope your answer. Bruno Leonard 01:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Were fron Autralia or New Zeland? As the flag? Bruno Leonard 01:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I confuse. It´s Australia. Sorry. :) Bruno Leonard 01:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Curious
Category:Australia articles by WikiProject - would there be any point in linking this to state projects and the maritime - in all my time of cat trawling i think this is the first time I would have spied it - cheers. SatuSuro 11:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks for that - good idea SatuSuro 11:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Just as well you asked me now - I may have up to a fortnights low to nothing edit stage due to real life - will have a look SatuSuro 12:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I am assuming its ok to put category tags at the base of theses pages - please alert me if you dont want em cheers SatuSuro 12:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Community of Christ the King
There isn't an image attached to this article - could you have meant another one? fishhead64 19:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Longhair/AUWPtable
Hi, I haven't updated User:Longhair/AUWPtable since the replag for enwiki is more than a week. Do you want me to do update the page or keep waiting for a lower replag? --Erwin85 09:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed, the replag is the time between the last known edit at the toolserver and the current time (i.e. the time of the last known edit on this Wikipedia). So an update now with a replag of seven days would give you the number of elements in the category seven days ago. Anyway, I'll update the page from now on. --Erwin85 09:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Since there are a lot of categories to count it puts less strain on the servers to use the database instead of counting by checking all category pages. However most bots don't use the database since there is no reason to. I don't know why the replag is so high at the moment, but normally the replag is zero, so it wouldn't be a problem. --Erwin85 10:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * As often as you'd like. At the moment I have it set at once per day, but I could do this, within reason, as often as you'd like. --Erwin85 10:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I just need to know when it's moved so I update the right page, besides that you can move it any time you want. My bot has to do what you want and not the other way around. --Erwin85 10:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I've placed  on the five subpages. Just transclude User:Erwin85/AUWPCount on any page and my bot will treat the page. I also fixed the wrong counts for the two categories you mentioned. --Erwin85 12:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This is caused by the replag. The replag is more than 8 days at the moment, so the toolserver database doesn't "know" yet that you populated the category, it will take 8 days before the toolserver is updated with todays data. I guess we'll just have to see if the replag goes down in the near future and if not look for another method to count the elements. --Erwin85 14:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Any12345678 rampage
Ah that may be my fault. See the talk page for Student Youth Network. It's the user's 3rd attempt to create this, the previous two having been culled as non-notable (and again they just cut and pasted the previous article in). In their whine over why the article should stay they tried to use the existence of other stations as justification. I pointed out this wasn't the point, and anyone could also mark those as non-notable. *sigh* That backfired --Blowdart | talk 08:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * What ramage?! I note (and with some amusement!) that you pick on people who try to make wikipedia better by creating articles. --User: Any12345678 | talk 04:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Empire Rose
Longhair, I'm not sure why there's a notice on my Empire Rose story indicating there are unwanted or unusable words or phrases. Can you explain please? Ron. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isoronical (talk • contribs) 23:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

La Mascara
La Mascara is actually an EP by The Blackeyed Susans not an album - don't know if that makes any difference. Dan arndt 01:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Isoronical
Hi Longhair, I have contacted this user by email and had a couple of telephone conversations with him. I believe that with his extensive knowledge of the Australian horse racing scene he will be a great asset to Wikipedia. I will endeavour to try and explain the many pitfalls he may encounter in learning to understanding Wikipedia. - Cuddy Wifter 07:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

User:Daniel Tavares
H Blondhair, why did you delete the Tempest Boats Page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.15.25 (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Kay.K.BayZ
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kay.K.BayZ. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. KayKBayZ 13:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PeanutButterSolution.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PeanutButterSolution.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the userpage revert...silly IP vandals! --Mikecraig 22:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Chaser AfD
Hi Longhair. I created the article with the intention to expand it, and replace the full details on the main page with a brief summary. I hadn't finished it yet, and I wasn't planning to abandon it entirely. See the debate. ~ Sebi  21:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a note on the talk page about the article, which is something I should have done immediately after I created the article. ~ Sebi  21:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The article was moved to The Chaser's well known stunts (*sigh*) and deleted for the same reason you brought up the AfD in the first place. I'll create a draft in my sandbox before I create anything like this again. Thanks for your understanding. ~ Sebi  05:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Schapelle Corby...
Hi Longhair

I reckon Bluetongue and Possems are the same person. Too much of a coincidence. Look at the names and contribs. Further, from my reckoning, Possems alone is now on 3 reverts. One more and they are over, although I haven't warned them on 3RR yet. --Merbabu 04:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Note
Hello, Longhair! I'd just like to remind you to substitute block templates, happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

THERMALTAKE DELETION!!! Urgent Need!!!!
I'm just wondering why Thermaltake was deleted. You said it was because of advertising but you went on to say that it was because of the logo and infobox. Does that mean so many other encyclopedia entries are also going to be deleted? I need to know why Thermaltake was deleted. Need a reply. Gunnerdevil4 03:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bega schoolgirl murders
The article Bega schoolgirl murders you nominated as a good article has failed, see Talk:Bega schoolgirl murders for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. I am however requesting a second opinion, as this is my first reviewing of an article for GA-class. Jappalang 03:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Page reversion
Thanks for the clean up. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cover kennedyapp speech.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cover kennedyapp speech.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Battered mars.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Battered mars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

DY71...
I noticed your reverts on ProudlyHumble. I think DY71 is going thru and removing all the sock notices from the user talk pages - ie, they should actually be on the user page instead. He's done about 20 talk pages tonight under the original socks' names. I say let the baby have his bottle for now. :-) regards --Merbabu 09:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

E-mail
FYI, I just sent you an e-mail (with similar copies to Netsnipe and Antandrus). --19:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

coordinates tags
As a coordinate-adder, I'd prefer that you did not use the tag, but the tag with the date added: e.g.: I'd appreciate this. Thanks! Sseballos 01:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

bot work
Thanks, I've already created WikiProject Aviation/Cleanup and WikiProject Aviation/BotStatistics/Maintenance in preparation of putting my own bot online (if I can figure the code out), but I see that it will be as easy as linking to User:Erwin85/AUWPCount and getting User:Erwin85Bot to do it (if Erwin agrees). There are probably many projects that would take advantage of this if contacted, so I believe a separate dedicated bot would be a good thing to set up. Are you a programmer? I'm trying to figure out how to change the bot code here so that it does not need to run off the toolserver, but from my home computer. Do you understand how this bot works? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 04:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Mildura images
Hi Longhair. I am working on a bit of a project intermittently over at Commons - Towns of Victoria. I would like to include your images of Mildura in the project. This would involve migrating them over to commons, which I would be happy to do if you have no objections. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 08:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

AUWPCount
Hi, I've set up my bot to treat pages linking to User:Erwin85/CatCount instead of User:Erwin85/AUWPCount. I've done this to make it more general. The latter is a redirect to the former so you could still transclude User:Erwin85/AUWPCount to make the bot treat the page. However I've changed transclusions of User:Erwin85/AUWPCount to User:Erwin85/CatCount to make it clearer and cleaner. Regards, Erwin85 20:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW I noticed you put up some new pages where you don't use the correct namespace, e.g. WikiProject_Australia/BotStatistics/Stubs-people. I assume in this case you want to count the pages in the main namespace so I changed the namespace. I've put up a more detailed explanation for the list of namespaces at User:Erwin85/CatCount. I hope that explains why I changed "1,14" to "0". If not, please let me know so I can try and explain it better. --Erwin85 20:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

My userpage
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my userpage! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi longhair.... I'm getting vandalism on my userpage. I've deleted it and added the Lawyer's details for the person who is known to us, as the vandaliser. He is assuming the identity of Kay Danes, he has created a false web site kaydanes.org to attack her maliciously. This is a personal vendetta against the Danes Family and the matter is being dealt with by Camatta Lempen Pty Ltd Lawyer and Director Stephen Kenny. Could you please keep an eye on our userpage and take appropriate action against this imposter? THank you! Sunnyroe 05:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ian Meldrum‎
Ian Meldrum‎ was edited by sockpuppets. If you have some time, would you read over Ian Meldrum‎ and make any necessary changes. Thanks. - Jreferee    t / c  17:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Australians in international prisons
Hi Longhair. Were you aware this was up for AfD? &mdash;Moondyne 01:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Australian TV Screenshots
Dear compatriot. As an Aussie you should be aware that the law here is in now way restrictive with regards to the use of tv screenshots from Australian tv productions for documentary purposes. Legally I can even use small clips. The restrictions here are defamation and reasonable length. Instead of a lengthy legalese, allow me to offer the activities of Media Watch and The Chaser as prima facie arguments. Anna Coren might prefer it otherwise. Both programmes would not be thinkable with restrictions with regards to providing documentary evidence via screenshots, or in their case even rather clips, for which rebroadcast permissions from the "copyright holder" would be hardly obtainable. Uneasy would be using a screenshot from ABC (or 9, etc.) of a picture of the prime minister to document him generally. To use a screenshot of him slipping on a banana peel on the other side would be permissible again if I want to document this event as documented by insert originating bradcaster here. Screenshots from foreign originating material again are a matter sui generis, therefore they are basically not used at all here. The same applies for audio broadcasts. Cheers, Oalexander-En 14:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Importance Setup
Gday, Im looking to setup an edu-importance system for WP:EIA to add to the AUS article template. I was wondering if you would be able to point me in the right direction for some sort of how-to guide. Many thanks. Twenty Years 05:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Im having issues with articles not going into the assigned categories, this article i assessed as Top-importance and it isnt going into the designated category this one and is remanin in the Unknown importance category. Is the category just slow to update or is the template in a caboodle? Twenty Years 05:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your help with the EiA problems. Very much appreciated :) Twenty Years 11:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup :) Its all working well, only 1300 more to be importance rated, category system is quite cool. Thanks v/much for the help. Twenty Years 01:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mother Goose dontbelieveinfairytales.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mother Goose dontbelieveinfairytales.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mother Goose thisisthelifemg.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mother Goose thisisthelifemg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:4n20logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:4n20logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LantanaDVD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LantanaDVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reference
Thanks for referencing me to the discussion regarding flag icons on John Howard's entry; greatly appreciate it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angkorgo2 (talk • contribs) 05:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Spebi's RfA
Hi Longhair. You made a comment on my RfA which isn't complete yet and which I haven't exactly signed to accept it yet :) I really appreciate your support, but would you be able to remove it and readd it once I accept the nomination and it is transcluded on the main page? Many thanks :) Spebi  05:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Battle of Disarm
An article that you have been involved in editing, Battle of Disarm, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Endless Dan 17:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Steady Eddie
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Steady Eddie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Steady Eddie is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Steady Eddie, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot 18:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism help
Can you head back to User talk:58.96.64.179 and block the IP again? It's continuing to vandalize, such as at Nejdet Şahin. Aelfthrytha (talk) 17:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Bega schoolgirl murders failed GA
Hi, the article Bega schoolgirl murders has failed its GA nominations for the reasons listed on its talk page. Jappalang (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Adding parameters to project banners
Hey Longhair. As you'll see here, I've "been bold" and added  to the article's WP Australia project banner because of an editor's concern that Queensland wasn't mentioned in it (and originally that Australia was). This brings me to a question: Are administrators the only people who should do this, or can editors too? I added  because I felt it was fairly obvious to be the case. When searching for the Queensland parameter, I had to look through a few pages to find one with it (being lazy to copy-and-paste it) – it wasn't even in Talk:Queensland nor Talk:Government of Queensland (I eventually found it in Talk:Townsville, Queensland)! Is this, well, normal? Is help required in doing this, if it is a manual process? Thanks in advance for your advice on this. SEO75  [  talk  ] 23:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Request help with disambiguation
Hi Longhair. From my time at Wikipedia, I have the impression you are the expert at fixing new articles. I recently started an article John Challis (gay activist). There is already another article on John Challis the actor. Should the actor's article carry a link at the top for the activist's article? I couldn't find the manual of style for how this is done. Can you do it? Thanks,  Lester  02:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Melbourne Dreamland prod'd
As someone who has contributed to the page, I thought I'd let you know Dreamland (Melbourne amusement park) has been PROD'd. Stumps (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It turns out not to have been a bunch of badly worded criticisms .. I've removed the tag with an explanation ... and made some minor changes to the page. The article could do with some sources.  Do you have any?? Stumps (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

notability
Hi, can you have a look at this article. For my own reasons I don't edit articles about those places. It's tagged as not demonstrating notability but AFAIK every other one in NSW has an article and they aren't so tagged.Garrie 03:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou



 * And as a very variously vagrant editor of recent - I could not find a fellow editor who deserves this particular award more - tirelessly helping out in the mundane back room stuff that gets the projects up to start - and the long term sustained high quality maintaining as well - that rarely finds another editor to ever help backup with - let alone anyone even noticing/acknowledging as such. Thanks SatuSuro 00:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Tags
I see that your practice is to place tags at the bottom of articles, rather than at the top. This is my practice as well. Might I inquire as to your inspiration or rationale for this? How long have you been doing this? And do you see this as a growing trend? Unschool (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what I wanted to know. Shanes' essay was the first thing that got me thinking about it, when I read it about 15 months ago.  I keep a link to the essay on my user page, and I frequently move tags to the bottom of articles—particularly cleanup tags.  I'm just glad to run across someone with a similar line of thought.  Cheers. Unschool (talk) 06:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

The Fergusons
I was hoping you could look at the article on The Fergusons I have undertaken further edits to this item which can be found at Talk:The Fergusons/Temp which addresses the potential copyright issue and provides greater detail in respect to the band's history. Could you let me know whether the updated article could replace the original and the copyright tage be removed. Dan arndt (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

Thanks
Thanks for the kind words. -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 15:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

QLD
There shouldn't be too many of them, I generally do use QLD. I was just a little careless with that one. Thanks for fixing that one and thanks for tweaking the template too. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 23:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Reliable Sources - Footystats
I was just wondering why you don't consider Kevin Taylors Footystats to be a reliable source? I would say that it was more reliable than the newspapers or AFL websites that often get things wrong, and never update or correct their stories. If KT is notified of a mistake he corrects it immediately. He's been doing this for years and has had it published in some books, and as Bruce McAvaney is quoted on the front cover of the 2000 printed version of Footystats "I wouldn't dare venture off ot the MCG for Friday night football without Footystats". What's next, bios from fullpointsfooty not reliable either? The-Pope (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Bali Nine references
I've created a subpage of the talk page for the Bali Nine article that will index all news articles covering the Bali Nine, for use in the article. Add any new ones you find to Talk:Bali Nine/Collected references – I found a lot more articles from Wikinews than I expected on my search :)  Spebi  02:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Article Ratings
How do I go about getting the article ratings lifted from 'Start' or 'Stub' class - I've had a look and believe that they should easily be a higher rating but don't know what the process is they I need to go through. I notice from a few other articles that I've worked on in the past (Jo Jo Zep & the Falcons, Brian Cadd) that you have changed the ratings so I was wondering if you can can you have a look at The Stems, The Triffids and The Hoodoo Gurus have been working on creating articles for the various albums, singles, band members etc for each - I wouldn't mind somebody checking them and letting me know what improvements I need to make to bring them up to a better standard. Dan arndt (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel a little strange rating articles where I have made most of the contributions - just like someone else to check them and see whether they feel the rating should be changed. So I appreciate your assessment. Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool
Nice user/talk page... very unique. -- Menti  fisto  03:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * When's long ago? How exactly did you 'steal' it? :-) -- Menti  fisto  03:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Found it (actually I tried to find it before my above questions but gave up after year 2005 since your userpage has so many edits) - you began using the program-UI-like box about a year ago... and yeah, I know the beauty of a wiki, I'm highly addicted. :-)
 * Actually I meant to ask you where you got it from... who the user was, if you remember, etc. -- Menti  fisto  04:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Juliedrugged.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Juliedrugged.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Letsgetskase.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Letsgetskase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janine Balding Story.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Janine Balding Story.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ablettdvdcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ablettdvdcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Something more pleasant than a bot complaint I hope,  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 06:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EarlyBirdShow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EarlyBirdShow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DadahISdeath dvdcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DadahISdeath dvdcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OnePerfectDay.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OnePerfectDay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LostPatrol tunnel.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LostPatrol tunnel.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LostPatrolRandR.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LostPatrolRandR.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LostPatrolmap.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LostPatrolmap.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Goddessof1967.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Goddessof1967.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Interviewwithamadman.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Interviewwithamadman.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mullet DVDcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mullet DVDcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Josh Jarman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Josh Jarman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Bots
HI and thanks for the tip. Generally, if I care about it enough I have it watchlisted and the bot message is redundant. Still, wasting valuable pixels replying to a bot doesn't really help anything! Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 21:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

unreferenced
you should always place and other templates at the top of articles so editors can see them right away, and readers can be aware that the content may not be referenced and true. --Dan Leveille TALK 08:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I do believe they are a little overly obtrusive, but I don't see the need to hide them. It's not like it's a permanent part of the article - editors will see it and want to get rid of it. I don't agree with you, but I'm not going to argue, as long as you're positively contributing. --Dan Leveille TALK 08:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Portals
Hi, could you possibly delete all the related portals except for the Banktown portal. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, later on I might re-create the Sutherland Shire portal and work on that. There would be plenty of info. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)