User talk:Longhairadmirer

List of women with very long hair
I've added the "prod" template to the article List of women with very long hair, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:List of women with very long hair. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Alphachimp 17:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * This list article is brand new, and we need time to make it good. Please suggest how it can be improved on its talk page. I did not think list articles had to be very "encyclopedic". Longhairadmirer 12:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Ruslana:
Your recent edit to Ruslana (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 20:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ai_Iijima.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ai_Iijima.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deja Chan
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deja Chan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this individual meets porn actress notability guidelines (i.e., awards, etc.)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thnx for the notice. I was convinced that this model had been sufficiently productive and successful for an article. Someone else deleted the template, and I need time to find more info. Longhairadmirer (talk)

March 2009
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Please see WP:Citing IMDB. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Aha. Didn't know that IMDB was not trustable. Longhairadmirer (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Solarra. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Both the Rapunzel syndrome aritcle and the poor source that already was provided showes that the current definition of Rapunzel syndrome in Trichophilia is very much confused. Longhairadmirer (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Per what Solarra stated about adding unsourced/dubious material, the same goes for the Secondary sex characteristic article. Flyer22 (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)