User talk:Look I made a name without bad words so LISTEN TO ME NOW

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BS has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: BS was changed by Look I made a name without bad words so LISTEN TO ME NOW (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919225 on 2016-07-30T03:10:19+00:00.

Response
I'm not allowed to use my IP talk page, so this is where I need to complain.

You revert my edits with no good reason, and when I don't just accept it, try to shut me up completely. I get called a troll and a vandal and I did nothing wrong except get pissed off that some people revert my edits instantly even though they are clearly constructive. And I think anyone could reasonably be angry about that.


 * Sorry, but since you've already been blocked, you need to appeal the block from your original account. If that's denied by UTRS, the only other recourse I see that you have is to email the Arbitration Committee. —C.Fred (talk) 21:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * This is clearly not a matter for arbcom. And what is one's 'original account' for this anyway? I was using an IP, not an account.


 * Well I can tell you about my original account. It was blocked indefinitely years ago because it was confused with an unrelated vandal, followed by an improper use of, and interpretation of, checkuser. And the person that blocked me then, as well as the person that blocked me now, and the person that immediately denied my UTRS request, are all female; two of them admitted lesbians, and I wouldn't be surprise if the third were as well. Women always give me trouble, and I suspect the original checkuser was just an excuse to block me because some with influence wanted to shut me up. That's how Wikipedia really works; it only pretends to be open and democratic.


 * So I came back as an IP, not wanting to create an account, just to make minor edits that should be uncontroversial without getting hassled. Look, if an edit is problematic, why not assume good faith and explain why instead of immediately reverting, then calling it VANDALISM when I reinstate it. That isn't done, it seems, because the same sh*t is happening again and some people are targeting me.

I can't make an unblock request from my IP since I'm locked out, so that's just disingenuous. I'd rather you unblocked this account than nothing, I suppose. You haven't addressed the real point (and I just fixed one of the edit links above - they were pointing to the same edit).