User talk:Look its wardy

Co-exist
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Co-exist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * You have created Co-exist then Co-Exist (the second spelling being the intended one), and requested that the former be deleted. The problem with this is that the history of the original article would be lost. It is possible to move pages to the correct place, using the Move tab at the head of the article page, and this is the correct action. Now that Co-Exist has been created this isn't immediately possible. An admin could do it, but what I advise is that (a) you blank Co-Exist and replace it with so that that page gets deleted, then (b) move Co-exist. Ros0709 (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's a template that can be used by me - which I have applied. Ros0709 (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, i couldn't find the move tab so thought this was the next course of action. You live and learn though.look its wardy (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Co-Exist appears to have been deleted very speedily after I nominated it again there - I don't know if it was because of my nomination or one of the previous discussions (notability, etc). In any case, just letting you know that I nominated it because the text was a straight lift from Co-Exist's website with no copyright assertion. See WP:CSD. --Bazzargh (talk) 15:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I did mean to add a copywright notice for the text but decided to rewrite it instead. There was a problem with the original naming of the page and this may have hastened deletion. It appears to be fine now, though the citations i had added to show notability were deleted by another user. Look its wardy (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Surgical Removal of the Teeth, Toenails and Drilling of the Kneecaps
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Surgical Removal of the Teeth, Toenails and Drilling of the Kneecaps, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.emusic.com/album/10917/10917676.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Co-Exist
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Co-Exist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Surgical Removal of the Teeth, Toenails and Drilling of the Kneecaps
A tag has been placed on Surgical Removal of the Teeth, Toenails and Drilling of the Kneecaps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Seegoon (talk) 21:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tony McGovern


The article Tony McGovern has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * there is no indication that this is notable; also it fails wp:music/Bio

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)