User talk:Lootsucker

Welcome!

 * }

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Defence
I'm no sock or anything. I just don't understand the "agenda" thing. Everyone edits wikipedia according to his or her interests, therefore everyone has an "agenda" on wikipedia. I just don't understand why having racist userpage is forbidden. By what right? --Lootsucker (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:User pages: [...]statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors or persons [are] generally considered divisive and removed, and reintroducing them is often considered disruptive[.] — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:NPOV is one of the Five pillars of editing WP. When you openly espouse a POV that cannot or will not be compromised in the interests of neutrality, it severely hampers your ability to edit here, and editors get blocked for it all the time. I guess it's, ironically, like a form of "reverse racism". If you want to appeal your block see WP:GAB. Doc   talk  03:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Puzzled
I don't understand your objection to being shut down. I thought you believed in totalitarianism. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)