User talk:Lopck12/sandbox

peer review
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? No, everything was concise and on topic.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes, from what I read neutrality was kept throughout the article.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, his topic was presented with enough information.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Citation work and support his topic.

Peer Review Response
Thank you for taking your time to review my contribution. I will be expanding my article more and including information I may have missed. Lopck12 (talk) 03:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Lopck12