User talk:Lopezj17/Evaluate an Article

Response
Hi JL -

I'm not seeing your completed article evaluation. Can you include it on this page?

Thanks, Pthomas4 (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Update!
Lopezj17: Nice work on this evaluation. I'm impressed by your choice of Greek Mythology as a topic for further study - it's clearly relevant to our course as well!

Your evaluation raises some important observations on the under-developed qualities of this article. It would be helpful to take this evaluation one step further to explain what additions are needed. You begin to do so in your evaluation of the article lead, but given that your final assessment concludes that the article needs work, what would do you suggest, exactly?

One additional point: you're correct that the sourcing is pretty good; however, I'm not sure what to make of that paragraph in the "Relationship with Achilles" section that is totally devoted to a single scholar (James Hooker). It might be worthwhile to see if there are any contrasting views to Hookers, just for the sake of building in a more neutral stance. But overall, very good observations! --Pthomas4 (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)