User talk:Lopezvilan/Ninja lanternshark

Andrew Gans Peer Review
I think what you have so far is good! It would be interesting to see more about the habitat, its diet, and its behavior. Instead of using the words "features" you could consider renaming it under a "morphology" section since features is a little vague. Andrew.gans (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Russi Byun Peer Review
I think this first draft is good, but could benefit from more concise and clear sentences. Perhaps by next week you can add a picture to the "features" part of the draft as well. I also think that the draft can benefit from headings. I also think the taxonomic breakdown is not needed, because it's already provided in the original article. Olivesaregreen (talk) 03:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Kate O'Hara Peer Review
I think this draft is good! I think one thing that you could change is maybe separating different “features” or characteristics into separate paragraphs to maybe make it easier to see what the different “features” are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kao24 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)