User talk:Lophophor A. Williams II

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

a prodded article
I am not a big fan of notification of authors, when people request things about "their" articles. I guess I am a bit conservative in this respect. Anyway, I prodded Karl Kroeber since I can not see anything in the article that explains whay this person is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. If you have anything to add, please do that by editing the article and/or discussing it on the talk. // habj (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I de prodded it, because of course he is notable, as shown by his many published books, held in thousands -- quite literally -- of libraries. The article was however wholly inadequate, not giving amost any indication of what he is in fact notable for, so I do really not blame habj for proding it--though he might have thought to at least check google Scholar. If you going to write an article on an academic-- or anyone--make sure people can see why the person is important. DGG (talk) 06:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greg Urban


The article Greg Urban has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Greg Urban – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 18:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lophophor A. Williams II! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robert A. Brightman -
 * 2) Thomas Buckley -
 * 3) James W. VanStone -

Nomination of Thomas Buckley for deletion
The article Thomas Buckley is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Buckley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  The Mi ke  •Wassup doc?  07:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert A. Brightman


The article Robert A. Brightman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:Notability no third-party, independent sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert A. Brightman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert A. Brightman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert A. Brightman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)