User talk:Lorasilver

Welcome!


Hello, Lorasilver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Kirpal Singh
You need to give a good reason for removing sourced content and wp:citations from an article Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Dear Jim1138 You automatically reverted edits with note unclear reason. I reverted your removal with clear explanation, that I removed absolutely unrelated information to article of Sant Kirpal Singh biography. If editors want to publish removed information it should be published in more appropriate articles

September 2017
Your recent editing history at Darshan Singh (Sant Mat) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kagundu Talk To Me  08:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Dear Kagundu Thank you for your comment I'm not involved in any war at all. A reverted your unexplained removal. You haven't left any reason of your deleting. So I can consider it as vandalism
 * It is really simple. Stop removing well sourced content from a page just because you deem it not necessary. The part you are removing is part of and about the subject of the article or some people related to him. If you keep removing the content then you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Kagundu  Talk To Me  10:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)