User talk:LordStDennis

Welcome
Hello, LordStDennis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Biker Biker (talk) 11:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Calamity Jane appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Deenoe 05:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fort Laramie Three-Mile Hog Ranch. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Acroterion  (talk)  11:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Calamity Jane, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Acroterion  (talk)  11:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Calamity Jane
If there is significant scholarship on the subject, you are welcome to discuss it in a neutral, referenced manner, rather than trying to defend her virtue through an editorial in the middle of the encyclopedia. Please reconsider your approach to the topic; you may well have a point, but you have obscured it with personal analysis that is at odds with other sources. If there is significant scholarship that is at odds with your opinion, it must remain, but it can coexist with contrary opinions.  Acroterion  (talk)  11:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)