User talk:LordTiberius

February 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 05:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gregory Goodrich
A tag has been placed on Gregory Goodrich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 19:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jarob Walsh
I have nominated Jarob Walsh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jarob Walsh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BigDunc 19:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Please be aware that content added to Wikipedia, especially when concerning living people, must be cited to reliable sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Some of your edits have been reverted because they did not adhere to this policy. (Keep in mind, too, that in order to avoid original research or synthesis, sources must be provided that are relevant to the subject.) –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Images
Hi, thanks for the link you added to Lockheed Martin P-791. I've changed it to a WP:EL (External link).

It wouldn't work as an image, as you were trying – please read WP:IMAGES. Images on WP need to be hosted by WP before they can be added. It doesn't just allow external web images to be added to pages (and a good thing too, the vandals would have a field day!). However images also need a "free licence" before they can be hosted here. It's possible that the excellent image you found does have such a licence (US Gov & US Mil sources would, some contractor PR photos do too), but we'd need to find a source that actually states this, and the host site you found doesn't go that far (as far as I can see).

At present I can't see how to add the image to the page legitimately, but we might yet either find that licence, or you could upload a small copy to WP under "fair use" (see WP:FUR).

Thanks again for finding and adding this. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

2011 Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan edits
Please cease inserting poorly-sourced conspiracy theories that violate Wikipedia's reliable sources policy and the biographies of living persons policy. Your edits contain unacceptable and unsupported accusations of criminal conduct. Please consult these policies before continuing to edit the encyclopedia. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The edits are quite literally accusing the president of the United States of treasonously conspiring with the Taliban to murder American soldiers. This is completely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Please review our content policies. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I have reverted your additions to 2011 Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan because it is slanderous and is based on an unreliable source. Please see WP:RS and WP:NPOV and do not reinstate it. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Your recent editing history at 2011 Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)