User talk:Lord 21

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Titanoboa, you may be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Helianthus
Hello, Lord 21 – Your recent  to Helianthus has been reverted by Apokryltaros because it was inserted into a section that describes the flower, actually a family of flower since there are many types of Helianthus, or sunflower. You'll see that the description is somewhat scientific in tone and quite specific. Statements about art don't belong in that kind of section. Apokryltaros also pointed out that the depiction of this flower in art mainly applies to one kind of sunflower, Helianthus annuus, so if information on the sunflower in art is added anywhere, it would be better added to that article. Don't be discouraged, though. If you look at the article on Rose, you will see that there is a small section on the rose in culture, Rose, including one small section on art, Rose. It should have citations, but it does not; hopefully someone will add them. It does have links to other Wikipedia articles, though. If you are interested in flowers in art, you might like to read Plants in culture, Peony, Iris, and Narcissus (plant). Not every flower article has a section on the use of that flower in art, but if you found material in reliable sources and wanted to create a section and add the material to an article on a flower, or any plant, you could. See WP:OR (no original research is allowed), and WP:CITE and WP:REFBEGIN to learn how to add references. You either have to quote from a source exactly, and indicate that it is a quote with quotation marks (or as a block quote), see MOS:QUOTE, or paraphrase (put it into your words but keeping the same meaning). In both cases you have to provide the source in a citation. You might enjoy contributing to the encyclopedia. Best regards, – Corinne (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)