User talk:Lord Dude

Blocked
I have removed the from your page since your block has expired. I know you request no editing of this page, but it is not appropriate to have that template on your page when you are not blocked. Also, the purpose of a talk page is for others to talk to you, your policy could become a serious problem, and as you have discovered, if you are persistent in acting contrary to Wikipedia policy, you may end up blocked again. We really are here to help, I am sure you will learn as you go. Feel free to ask for help at any time. Cheers, NoSeptember   talk  01:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. And btw, welcome to Wikipedia and welcome to Esperanza. Have fun editing :-). NoSeptember   talk  02:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: HI
I would be glad to help if you describe your problem to me.-- digital_m  e  ( Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 01:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Your block
As it said on your block message, 17:21, April 30, 2006 Zoe blocked "Lord Dude (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (repeated recreation of Phillip Bartlett) . User:Zoe|(talk) 01:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: User:Zoe
You were blocked because you recreated a deleted page, with essentially the same content. The proper way to go about recreating a deleted page is to discuss it on the talk page for the article before recreating it. I am not going to get involved in this, because I really have no relation whatsoever to this issue. If you were looking for a neutral third party to mediate, then I would suggest going to WP:RfM, but this issue really isn't serious enough for an RfM. I suggest that in the mean time, you discuss the issue with Zoe, and please remember to be civil. Regards. -- digital_m  e  ( Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 02:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Read Notability, which explains a lot about how notable a person must be to have an article about them here, and how to convey that notability in your articles. NoSeptember   talk  03:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Zoe
I'll try but MegamanZero is in trouble with breaching the 3RR rule, which usually merits a tempoary block. Why did you decide to come back? ¬_¬ I'll ask Zoe.

Anyway, it's the morning, where is the profanity on The JPS's userpage? It's not obvious. Cheers, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 07:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocking
Only an admin can block a user, which is done by going to Special:Blockip/Username.-- digital_m  e  ( Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 00:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Admin
To become an admin, you have to have an WP:RfA. Generally, this requires around at least 1000 edits (some users look for upwards of 3000), and a real commitment to Wikipedia. You also need to have been around for a while (at least 4 months), but you can judge for yourself by looking here.-- digital_m  e  ( Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 03:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Right
Someone keeps answering my questions while I sleep. ''Yes, you are ready for Esperanza. You have over 150 edits and have been here for over 2 weeks. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 01:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC'' Cheers, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 07:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, fine. I won't answer your questions, but it is so tempting to answer them. -- George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 07:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * To join Esperanza, go here and follow the instructions there. -- George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 14:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Yay
Yay! ^_^ H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 20:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Sig
Do you want any specific colours or words, or do you want some words up in the air? Cheers, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 20:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Right, go to My preferences at the top of the page (in the line next to your watchlist and talk page links). Go to Nickname and replace what's there with this -

Lord Dude | Talk to me!

Now, directly below the Nickname space where you've put that, you'll saw a box that has the words Raw signature next to it. You have to click that for this to work. After you've selected that box, click Save. It should work now.

Cheers, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 21:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Go to Tip of the day/June 30, 2006

Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Lord Dude, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of JoanneB, FireFox and Titoxd. The next set of elections will be in April, we will keep you updated about the results. Because you are a new member, you are not able to vote in these elections, but you will be more than welcome to take part in the elections in June.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC Tutorial written by one of our members. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

I Lov  E Plankton 20:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to welcome you as well. —   nath a nrd o tcom (T • C • W) 02:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

experiment

So you know..
The use of in your signature isn't working the way you think. —   nath a nrd o tcom (T • C • W) 15:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello!


PCEevee has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and many feel they are also contagious! Spread the WikiLove by smiling to two other people, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding to their talk pages. Happy editing! Note: the template won't work properly without the subst.

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Lord Dude! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Michele Knotz -
 * 2) Erica Schroeder -
 * 3) Christina Rodriguez -

Nomination of Christina Rodriguez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Rodriguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christina Rodriguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 02:54, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michele Knotz


The article Michele Knotz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability, trivia, wp bio, only source is outdated purely promotional hype dead link!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Captain Screebo Parley! 16:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Michele Knotz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michele Knotz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michele Knotz & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tikiwont (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TAJ Productions


The article TAJ Productions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 20:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pokémon: The Mastermind of Mirage Pokémon


The article Pokémon: The Mastermind of Mirage Pokémon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indepentent sources with SIGNIFICANT coverage for the film can be found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)