User talk:Lord Lingden

Welcome!
Hello, Lord Lingden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dloh cierekim  03:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Please help us by improving this article:
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Articles require
 * significant coverage
 * in reliable sources
 * that are independent of the subject.


 * Significant coverage
 * We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
 * Reliable sources 
 * We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
 * Independent
 * Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.

A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search Dloh cierekim  03:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominic Lord (October 19)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  T K K ! bark with me if you're my dog!  17:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominic Lord


The article Dominic Lord has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability. no sources. rejected afc submission. have left a note with reviewer. looks speediable to me, but won't be hasty

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dloh cierekim  03:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * it's been sent back to AfC. It had been declined and should not be moved to Article space unless and until it has been accepted by a reviewer. There are no sources and the subject does not meet notability requirements as the article now sits. Dloh cierekim  03:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominic lord
Hello Lord Lingden,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dominic lord for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominic lord


The article Dominic lord has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. freshacconci talk to me  23:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Dominic lord. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. freshacconci talk to me  00:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your main user page
While it is perfectly acceptable to have draft articles in user sub-pages, such as User:Lord Lingden/sandbox, your main user page, User:Lord Lingden, should not be used for this purpose. Because it appeared to be an incomplete draft article, I moved it to User:Lord Lingden/sandbox2 and left a 1-sentence link behind.

If it was really about you and not a draft article, please understand my confusion. If this page was about you, you can restore parts of it but leave off anything that might be considered self-promotional, such as any web site, Facebook page, etc. associated with your professional life.

I would encourage you to overwrite the one-sentence link that I put on your user page and replace it with something that tells a little about what you like to edit on Wikipedia.

See User pages for more information about what is and is not appropriate for your main user page. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  04:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dominic Lord


Hello Lord Lingden. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dominic Lord".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)