User talk:Lordtekken

Image tagging for Image:Bodhisattva dancers3-754760.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bodhisattva dancers3-754760.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Mancinelli


The article Joseph Mancinelli has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Xtzou ( Talk ) 22:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I think that at ;least one of the refs is OK, and I added another. I have consequently removed the prod tag. However, the article seems to have been written in a somewhat promotional manner, and I did some editing. Please be aware of WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:COI. Please document the career fully, but do not include statement e with adjectives of praise and puffery like "important''.  DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

January 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. ''Stop removing the tag and stop moving other articles around. '' Praxidicae (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Now you're just edit warring. Consider this the final warring for that too. Every source in the article of Vinzan supports the name being Vinzan. Praxidicae (talk) 19:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vinzan


The article Vinzan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Entirely self-sourced and promotional. Contested G11."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  18:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Town of Vinjan incorrectly tabled as Vinzan without any sources. Moved to correct page. Vinzan is known cannabis company in Canada with published sources warranting its own Wiki page.

January 2019
Your recent editing history at Vinzan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 19:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinzan international (January 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lordtekken/Vinzan international and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lordtekken/Vinzan international, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lordtekken/Vinzan_international Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lordtekken/Vinzan_international reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello Lordtekken. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to User:Lordtekken/Vinzan international, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lordtekken. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bradv 🍁  20:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Lordtekken/Vinzan international


Hello, Lordtekken. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Lordtekken/Vinzan international.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)