User talk:Lordwesel

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  03:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nikki Benz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dismas |(talk) 04:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

reverts
Hi. I saw that you had complained that everytime you make a change it gets changed back.

Actually, according to your edit history, at least five articles have remained as they were when you edited them (the ones with (top)) next to their names. In the case of the other articles, as you can see from the warnings above, other editors have had doubts about the accuracy and/or reliability of what you have added, and reverted it. If you would like some help with those edits, let me know on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
It looks like your edits are being undone by another editor. I think this edit was a bit of a problem, while they are a pornographic actress, inserting that image into the top of the article really isn't appropriate. I hope that explains your questions. If you have a look over this page here, it will explain a few basic things about Wikipedia in a simple way. Let me know if I can be of any assistance.

Steven  Zhang  Join the DR army! 05:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * I reverted that edit for three reasons: 1) The image is a copyright violation. Basically, someone else owns the rights to that image and you violated those rights by using it in a manner that doesn't go along with their rights to it.  2) The images in articles are supposed to be used for identification purposes.  With that image, you can hardly see her face.  3) Though Wikipedia is not censored, we don't go around trying to shock people either.  Basically, images showing nudity should only be in articles where people have a reasonable expectation of seeing nudity.  For example at the article for nudity but not in an article about a person who they may not know is involved in the pornography industry.  Dismas |(talk) 06:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)