User talk:LoreMariano/Archive 2

With regard to your recent edit comment, please read and conform to Civility. - Outerlimits (talk) 03:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)75


 * The text you propose is highly inflammatory as I think you know. LoreMariano (talk) 03:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Even if it were, it would not excuse you calling views you disagree with "filthy". But it is factual, not inflammatory, and was in the article for years. There's no excuse for the lede not to reflect the article's content. - Outerlimits (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * You can't cherry pick from the article the derogatory information you want to appear in the lead. Hopefully the final lead will reflect a summary of what is in the whole article, not just the points you want to make in the way you want to make them. LoreMariano (talk) 04:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it certainly should start reflecting the article content, and now, not some remote time in the future. If you think there is something missing from the lede, you add it in, you don't delete summaries of content just because you don't like it. You've had months to make this right; you haven't, so now it falls to others to do. - Outerlimits (talk) 04:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The last section should be coming soon and then we can all turn our attention to the lead. LoreMariano (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)