User talk:Loregraphic

Welcome
Hello Loregraphic and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Steve Norman, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Steve Norman. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Loregraphic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

On wikipedia we don't have official outside organizations overriding our policies
You need to stop, now. Wikipedia is not a Webhost and changes in articles are not unilaterally decreed. You must follow our policies and guidelines. ThanksDlohcierekim (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest
Just to make this clear, because you've apparently been bothering at least two people whom I happen to work with fairly regularly, but we actually don't care about your official bio, and we don't want it. This isn't your website; this is an encyclopedia. If you continue to push the issue it may result in a whole lot of unwanted attention, including having accounts, and IP addresses associated with your organization blocked from editing the encyclopedia. Take the time to very carefully review our politics on conflicts of interest and abide by them. Timothy Joseph Wood 22:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Jeez, Timothy. don't mince words. Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Don´t understand
Someone can help? We want to edit official content not vandalism. Pls help here...thanks!
 * That's the problem. There is no such thing as "official content" on Wikipedia. We are an encyclopedia-- not your "official outlet". If you are receiving compensation in any form to edit here, you need to read WP:PAID before editing further. You may discuss changes on articles and seek consensus on said changes like any other member of the community. You must follow WP:consensus, not edit as though you WP:own the article.Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:47, 11 June 2017 (UTC)