User talk:Lorelie18/sandbox

Article evaluation feedback
This is a pretty fascinating topic! This article is fairly robust for a start-class article, but start-class in general isn't as well developed as a c-class article, so might not give a great sense for goals in what you might be trying to accomplish with the stub- or start-class article you end up improving this term. That said, you make some thoughtful observations in your evaluation notes. There are some places where more specific examples would be helpful (such as where you note that the article is overly detailed at times and goes off the main topic...giving an example of where it does this would clarify what you're seeing). Overall, you have a solid evaluation here! Nicoleccc (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)