User talk:Loriendrew/Archive 6

Griffin Layne
Hi there, it's a shame they didn't allow the "New Yorker" language to slide on wiki. I'm a New Yorker myself.

I noticed a great deal of changes made to Mr. Layne's wiki page. Thank you for your edits. I believe the page appears much more concise. I would appreciate it if you would remove the "stub" notification and "notability" notification on the page. There are wiki articles that directly link to the artists wiki page and we will be adding as much media coverage as possible to further the notability. Mr. Layne is a signed recording artist, has won notable awards, spends a lot of time with organized charities and has been a major contributor to the music industry, as well as the humanities.

I respect wikipedias guidelines and will continue to follow them, as it is important to our team.

Thank you for your help and consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Districtmemberboard (talk • contribs) 18:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * To un-stub (stub meaning a short article) just add more appropriate content. As for notability, essentially the same thing, add content. As for "notable" awards, to be notable they should have articles. Please note that the article is not up for deletion, it just needs work.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  18:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Will continue to gather media and related materials, as they are made available. Thank you for your help.

The wiki direct links include (Music from Ohio, List of people from Ohio, List of people from Virginia, List of country performers by era, List of country rock musicians and List of country music performers) I would greatly appreciate the removal of the notability link on the page. I will not do it myself, as I did not post it there, but it may have a negative affect on those who wish to view Mr. Layne's accomplishments. Thanks again for your help.Districtmemberboard (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)districtmemberboard
 * Being on a "List" is not a sign of notability. Please see WP:MUSICBIO and Wiki's notability guidelines for details. Improve the article.. the maintenance tags are there for a reason.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  20:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I have carefully read and understand the guidelines in the links that you sent me. Thank you for this.

This artist does meet several of the notability guidelines under the WP:MUSICBIO and Wiki's notability guidelines. You are supposed to satisfy one requirement and I see at least four that are satisfied.

1) Griffin Layne Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3] Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories. Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.

2) Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.  This is why the Fairfax Times interviewed him and wrote a published article (largest portion of entire newspaper devoted to Griffin Layne). Griffin is a Virginia resident and is one of the prominent music figures in the State and County.

3)Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition. He won four industry awards, including winner "best alt rock artist" at the los angeles music awards, best male country artist and best country song. Those are WON and first place awards. Only one award can be won in each of these categories.

4) Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. FM Radio is national. Griffin Layne's music is on several FM stations and he is on the most played list for at least one 93.5 FM.

Districtmemberboard (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)districtmemberboard
 * One by one...

-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  21:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) minor publications, and not really "multiple", I take that as more than two significant or national publications.
 * 2) One article does not make a person prominent. What style? What scene?
 * 3) None of those are major music competitions, those were awards, and none of them major.
 * 4) One station does not qualify for national rotation.

1) Multiple means more than two, while these newspapers only covered 300,000 residents at the time of their publications (still seems notable and there is no qualifying number) the newspapers took enough of an interest to reach out and write articles about this artists accomplishments. It does not state in the guidelines that these Newspapers must be National.

2) Mr. Layne is in the Country Music genre, as described by his awards and multiple outlets show this in a google search. Fairfax County, which includes multiple cities, but we can just use Fairfax city as an example, only writes about their local prominent figures and nationally broadcasted figures, as shown in their newspaper. This paper delivers to its 128,000 residents. He has played at CMA Festival, the biggest music festival in the world for Country Music and has won awards across the United States.

3) You are correct. No major awards, according to wiki guidelines.

4) "Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio network". Rotation is defined as one spin. Griffin has been placed on rotation in multiple major radio networks.

I apologize for the back and forth, but we are just following the guidelines as expressed. It does not explicitly state that an artist needs X number of media articles in the most syndicated newspaper or television show. It's rather ambiguous. This artist has played in the USA, Europe and South America. His song is on FM radio, nationally, and while the newspapers in question do not cover the United States...they do not have to according to the guidelines for notable musicians.

We will continue to build the article with more media support, but the information provided thus far meets the requirements to at least remove the maintenance tag.

Thank you for your continued help and support. We appreciate it very much. Districtmemberboard (talk) 22:34, 3 July 2016 (UTC)districtmemberboard

Quick question
Hi Lorien,

I am just not sure what I have done wrong. You have opened a suck puppet investigation against me. I have only one account, but some times use my PC without logging in. Perhaps you could help me clear this up and correct anything I have done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mielhoney (talk • contribs) 20:20, 9 July 2016‎
 * You created the thrice declined Draft:Lohan Yoga. Another user, as their first and only edit, copied the draft into an article. Quite often it can mean the original author creates a new account (WP:SOCKPUPPET), or has another person assist (WP:MEATPUPPET), to do something with which they do not desire to be associated.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  12:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lorien thanks for clearing this up. Yes, one of the members of our organisation must have cut and paste the draft article. It's a big organisation with many members, I did email around asking for help from anyone who is expended with Wikipedia.

Is the a limit to the number of times a Draft article can be submitted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mielhoney (talk • contribs) 08:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dawn ODG (Rapper)
Hello Loriendrew. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dawn ODG (Rapper), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The deletion discussion was not a consensus on the merits, it was a speedy delete, making the article ineligible for G4. Thank you. –Darkwind (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I replaced the CSD removed by a COI editor, but did not place the original. Thanks for the notice though.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hi Loriendrew, Thank you for your message on my talk page. the information of the date of birth of the Ashley Hinshaw article, can be confirmed at this link:  Ashley Hinshaw - Biography .  Rafaela17,  Rafaela. 21:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC-3)
 * IMDb may not be used as a reliable source for biographies. Please see Citing IMDb.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nice As Fuck


A tag has been placed on Nice As Fuck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Someone else already removed the CSD, but as the group meets WP:MUSICBIO point 6, and has multiple WP:RS this is not a CSDable article. Feel free to bring it to AFD if you disagree.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for providing a reason for linking to a publisher within a citation
Loriendrew, thank you for providing a reason why someone may link to a publisher in a citation. I see the key word as "can" and not "must", and object to citations I provided having non-essentials such as a wiki-link to the publishers wiki-article, but I only provided half the citations, and I don't object enough to fight it on the Nice As Fuck article. I find that providing a constructive comment for an edit to be very helpful, so I appreciate you taking the time. Mburrell (talk) 02:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not linking it in the summary, but have a look at Help:Citation Style 1.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Spoon River Anthology -- Percy Grainger
Hi Loriendrew,

Yesterday I heard some lovely pieces on my local classical music station that the announcer said were by Percy Grainger and wer adaptations from Spoon River Anthology. As is my wont, I immediate went to Wikipedia to learn more. I found no mention of an adaptation by Percy Grainger on the Spoon River Anthology page so I went to the list of Percy Grainger's composition. Sure enough, there it was.

I tried to add an additional listing for a Spoon River Anthology adaptation to their page but my first attempt was rejected because I erroneously labeled it as a minor edit. The second attempt has now failed because I failed to provide a reliable source. That source is the Wikipedia page for Percy Grainger's works!

This is only the second time I've submitted an entry to Wikipedia. The first was a clarification. I'm sorry to say that the instructions for editing content really need a fresh look as they are incredibly confusing! In addition to wanting to add the Percy Grainger listing to the Adapations sub-page, I also wanted to add a link to Spoon River on the Grainger page. Absolutely could not figure out how to so that. Please note, I'm not a novice. I was a wiz at using HTML for a very long time!

I understand that you are a bare-bones operation that depends heavily on volunteers. This is one of the reasons that I am a monthly contributor! But, given this experience, unless I have a way to directly communicate with someone when I find a truly glaring omission or error, this will be the last time I try to participate until things are simplified.

MisTBlu (talk) 04:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Best regards, Keta Hodgson

PS - Just saw that I should insert four tildes before my signature. Seriously? I suppose it's to prevent bots from trying to mess things up but for an older person like myself with not the greatest vision in the world, those tiny messages are easily overlooked.
 * The example you give above is an example of original research, something you know because of something your parents said, you just "know" is true, or in this case a DJ (can you really call a classical music host a DJ?) Anyway, that host must have gotten it from a source, so the information must be out there. This is where verifiability comes into play. If those pieces are based on the poems then there should be something in writing about it somewhere, which then could be added along with the source using the guidelines at WP:Citing sources.
 * As for the signature, looking at the box where you edit, along the top are some icons, such as "B" for bold, "I" for italics, then some squiggly thing with a pencil. Clicking that will add not only the tildes (4 of which add your signature as well as the time and date).-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit summary on Hunger Games
I removed the action cat because there was a consensus that it wasn't an action film years back. Darunia02 (talk) 23:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The vast majority of your edits do not have an edit summary, it was not just one edit.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

re:David Bergelson
I am not sure why correcting inaccurate and unprofessional information is not constructive. An unknown person had removed a previous quality draft of the article and irresponsibly replaced it with the one I edited. I am a power user of computers and a distinguished professor at Purdue University. I am not related to Bergelson. I read the guidelines and I do not see any violations on my part. I did delete some invisible mark-up on the accidental references that I removed. Please help me re-establish historical and literary accuracy. Thank you!Victor Raskin (talk) 03:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Victor Raskin
 * There are multiple issues with the edit. The major change is the non-encyclopedic content that was added. There is a manual of style and format to follow. Removing sourced content is also not helpful. If there is controversy then offer an alternate view, but censoring out one ideology for another is against maintining a neutral or balanced point of view. Please discuss those type of things in the article's talk page.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  15:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

To Thank
I´m very grateful for the welcome, I just want to thank too for deleting the other page and yup I will stay, this is my second space in wikipedia, my principal is in spanish were I edit some articles, and I wanna to try in english. Again thanks for your disposition and welcomes. --Wikiplayer99 (talk) 02:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You created that article in mainspace, not user space.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Links were not adverts or spam links.
In ref to the Concealer wiki, the link I added was not spam. The article has more in depth details about concealers, types and applications. It does not promote or advertise any product. There is not even an anchored text in the content to product. If you compare the reference link on the Concealer page, it has the same information and the link I added has even more information than the other 3.

If ref to the Makeup Brush wiki, again it is the same as the above and compared to the other older link in the reference section, the link I added had way more info and again does not link, promote or advertise any product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavithra Balakrishnan (talk • contribs) 05:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * A site which sells the product should not be used as a reference. Anyway, user blocked so nothing to see here.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  16:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit to King Cobra
Hi Loriendrew, just a follow up to this response, the edit I made the the page was to try and keep it consistent with the caption immediately to the left of it that reads "A king cobra in its defensive posture". I wasn't sure if "defencive" was correct, but I new Defense was definitely correct. Either way, thanks for informing about the policy that it just doesn't matter :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.253.75 (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks for pointing out the multiple spellings of the word. They have all been changed to match, per MOS:ENGVAR.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "Defencive" and "offencive" are both incorrect in British English. Zaian (talk) 11:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Seeing both are an obsolete form of the word. Thanks for fixing it!-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?
Hi Loriendrew! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a very active Twinkle user (top 25, actually!). The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle User. Include the following information:
 * Username
 * Email where we can reach you
 * Your city or time zone
 * Best time to talk to you
 * Your primary use of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Swimmy (Friends) Deletion
In the future, please do not report pages as vandalism and hoaxes or recommend speedy deletion unless you actually have proof of the subject being a hoax. Swimmy is a real character on the American sitcom Friends. Though he plays a minor role, his effect on the group is large. The Swimmy (Friends) page was created to compile information about an often overlooked character that has little information and documentation online. He does exist in the Friends plot, and I would greatly appreciate it if you didn't delete pages willy nilly without reason. Thank you Kn99cowen (talk) 03:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Information in articles need to be verifiable through reliable sourcing. One reference was cited in the article which mentioned neither the character nor the portraying actor. No proof was supplied to prove this character exists, which is the onus of the submitter.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  14:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Darryl McDaniels
How about instead of being so concerned with being a pseudo-moderator you take the time to look at what it is you're reverting? I mean, it would have taken minimal effort but you're too worried about getting pointless Wikipedia badges to actually try to improve the site instead of just mass-reverting things without doing ten seconds of research first, right? I really, really love seeing all of these complaints against you boiling down to low-effort box checking. Well done, you're really improving the community. Cactido (talk) 06:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Speaking of minimal effort, why didn't you place a citation rather than remove the cite needed tag. Take responsibilities for your own actions.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  17:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Page Updates Removed
Hi,

I updated the wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Mortgage_and_Housing_Corporation

Note that I work for the organization and was updating the page as a lot of what was there is out of date. I'm unsure of what your note meant: 'An edit that you recently made to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation seemed to be a test and has been removed.'

The version I uploaded was final and would need you to reinstate the changes I made.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.69.29 (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has a very nice Manual of Style which you crumpled up and threw in the trash. Your edits broke formatting and references. Also have a look at WP:Citing sources. There was too much damage to easily save. Please look at the suggestions given and carefully edit the article.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  01:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your original comment didn't say anything about a style guide. A bit of clarity on the matter would have been nice. Furthermore, there is no reason for the comment you made when I was being completely civil. I reviewed the style guide, and don't know exactly what it is that did not conform to the style guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.69.29 (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Loriendrew explain your message
Loriendrew explain your message — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim colhern (talk • contribs)
 * Which message do you mean? Is it the disruptive editing one for continuing to change American and British spelling styles after you were warned by someone else, or is it the warning about placing new talk page message at the end of a talk page, which is a very clear message.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  19:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * the 1st one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim colhern (talk • contribs) 02:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Twice you changed the spelling of certain words, namely color and luster. These are not spelling mistakes but variations of spelling the same word between American and British spelling styles. If you click on that link it will explain why you should not be doing it.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  06:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Willie Dunn
Hello there, I made a minor edit to the Willie Dunn page. He was born on in 1941 and not in 1942 as was stated. Willie was my late husband. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MooreLiz (talk • contribs) 22:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Even if it was wrong, proper sourcing of such helps, which has been added. Be very careful of both having a conflict of interest and making edits based on own assumed knowledge.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  00:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr
Hello.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

Black Supremacy
It's a bit dramatic to suggest that my edits are "unconstructive". A cursory glance at the talk page (and its archive) suggests that the topic which relates to my edit keeps coming up. That fact would suggest that current position towards this topic is not suitable for wikipedia. Like most people who are interested in providing accurate information on Wikipedia, I'm happy to discuss this topic further. Brough87 (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems that you have been warned numerous times about WP:BRD. Instead of participating in an WP:EDITWAR, participate in a discussion on the appropriate talk page. In this case, since there is an established consensus and discussion you should address any concerns and issues at Talk:Black supremacy.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  17:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

One Thousand Ninjas
hello loriendrew, i created a wikipedia account just to inquire about how on this page you deleted an entry about something called "One Thousand Ninjas" with a predicted release date of 2076. im not the person who contributed this but i am extremely curious as i cannot find evidence of this anywhere else on the internet... how did this person know? are they a time traveller trying to warn us about One Thousand Ninjas? does this sort of thing happen often? perhaps i can brush it off as just Trolling and not something to be legitimately thinking about? or are you mystified too and we'll just have to wait until 2076 to see? thanks for your time and keep up the good work, it looks like you do a lot of it here on the ol' free encyclopedia!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishingbabe (talk • contribs) 09:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  18:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

mysterious as ever!! thank you for clarifying though! i suppose we will indeed have to wait and see! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishingbabe (talk • contribs) 06:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Seminole Heights
Hi, you removed my edit to the Seminole Heights article showing that the two-headed gator seal is a hoax saying that I didn't provide a source. But I did provide a source—images of the original unaltered 1912 Hillsborough High School yearbook pages that were used to fake the Seminole Heights ad with the "two-headed gator seal." That proves that the seal is a hoax, because the source for the seal is credited as the 1912 Hillsborough High School yearbook which does have those ads in it, without a graphic image. I undid your edit and cited the source to the image. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4thgenTPA (talk • contribs) 13:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * From Image use policy: "The purpose of an image is to increase readers' understanding of the article's subject matter", not to be used as a reference. A reliable source should be found to support claims.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  23:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

George Lakey (response to your ring)
Hi Lorien,

I do not understand how this happened. I am morally certain that there was an article on George Lakey when I posted that addition to the List of peace activists article. I would not have deliberately posted something that did not meet the specs, and furthermore, I do not know where I would have gotten his date of birth or the link to the Movement for a New Society unless I had found them in that article on WikiPedia.

But I also see that the edit history of the George Lakey article begins in December this year, so I am mystified. I was not involved in any way with that article.

I cannot guess why I have a clear recollection of that article actually existing when I made that addition, given in addition the information about DOB and Movement for a New Society that I put in my addition. Was the original article deleted? (Unlikely as you reverted within a few hours of my addition). Or is my aging memory (I am 76) just playing tricks on me?

Anyhow, my edit summary to my re-addition was made in good faith.

Best, and please know, we all appreciate the work that our editors such as you do.

Bill Jefferys Bill Jefferys (talk) 03:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

The science of silver obviously predates US english and therefore needs to be written in proper english.
The science of silver obviously predates US english and therefore needs to be written in proper english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim colhern (talk • contribs) 01:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The "proper english" to use in your edits of Silver is detailed at MOS:RETAIN. You have been warned numerous times regarding the change in language. Follow the links in those messages on your talk page for details.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep Matheus Soares (DJ)
This page can not be deleted because it is not the same subject, because it is another subject Matheus Soares (DJ) this page must be maintained, it has been deleted because it was moved ideally! RobertCaldwell (talk) 03:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The proper place to contest a deletion is on the article's talk page, which is where you have already responded.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  03:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))

Emails
Hiya! So I raised this issue a while ago, and it seems to be the same one you were having here. You said you inserted code in some template to resolve it, at least until the issue is fixed. Which template would that be and what is the code? Thanks in advance. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 21:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I added the following to my common.js subpage: fix at phabricator. Good luck!-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  21:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Re: RevDel request
Re your message: The multiple musical notes are rather strange and a bit annoying, but not RevDel material. Strange edit summaries are not sufficient for RevDel unless the summary is disruptive. This is is just a bit weird/annoying. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Zakrice Speedy Deletion
Hi Loriendrew, I removed the speedy deletion template from Zakrice. I could be wrong, but I think the article makes a credible claim of significance. This is because the article indicates the subject was featured on an album with its own article by an artist with its own article as well. It appears to be "reasonably plausible" and "plausibly indicates that additional research (possibly offline, possibly in specialized sources) has a reasonable chance of demonstrating notability is a claim of significance".  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I tend to not place db:hoax on BLPs, as technically this should have received one instead of the db:band. Credible claims should come with an attempt at proof, and given the author's previous hijack attempt at Zachg diff it just appears wrong.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  14:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Why Don't you want the FG picture changed?
Why can't we use the Picture I uploaded? It's rarer than white.. Only 101 built — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whincup12345 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see MOS:IMAGES and what not to do if if an edit is undone. The lead image should be a common representation of the subject. There are plenty of images in the article, or space for a new one, where a "rare" (if such claims can be cited) could be placed.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  18:52, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

https://gyazo.com/07a744defca56bd44538b5019100360c :) you were saying? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whincup12345 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Gyazo appears to be an image capture system, not a reliable source.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)