User talk:Lormi001/Phillipe Cunningham

General info Whose work are you reviewing? User: Lormi001 Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillipe_Cunningham

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise Lead evaluation Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes Is the content added up-to-date? Yes Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? At points, for the most part Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Yes, makes you like her and the things she accomplished Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, plenty Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes Are the sources current? Yes Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all do Sources and references evaluation Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes Organization evaluation Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A Are images well-captioned? N/A Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A Images and media evaluation For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? N/A How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? N/A Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info-boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? N/A Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? N/A New Article Evaluation Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, good work What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths are the stories of the effects she has made in her life, in the modern world, what type of effects she is leaving behind in her trail. How can the content added be improved? Maybe add more about future implications, guesstimations of what will happen in the future.

GVR117 (talk) 03:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Grace Randolph