User talk:Lorne McGregor

I will continue to do some adjusting of the format. I apologize I had to leave it in the middle. We try to avoid unnecessary links to countries, because of the number of such links. Be careful to avoid all statements of how good, important or prestigious the society is, unless you have an actual third party source for them. .

What you could no most usefully do is add a section for information about the society's journal. Include a list of editors in chief; link them, because editing a major journal, just like being president of a society, is considered to make someone notable enough for there to be an article. Let me judge later if it will be suitable to move it to a separate article--it depends primarily on where it is indexed Based on what is generally accepted here, an article or section about a journal should    contain:
 * 1) Full titles, any earlier titles, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
 * 2) Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
 * 3) availability on line
 * 4) no. of articles published a year
 * 5) ISSNs for both print and online versions
 * 6) Online availability of current and earlier issues
 * 7) Open access availability, if relevant.
 * 8) Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
 * 9) coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index)
 * 10) latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
 * 11) any actual references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
 * 12) External links to the journal's main web site, and, if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.
 * 13) The name and affiliation of the editor in chief, and all previous editor-in chief, with dates. ; since being the editor of a major journal is considered notable, an article can also be written about them. But we do not include other staff, or the editorial board.

It should not contain
 * 1) General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
 * 2) Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
 * 3) A list of those on the editorial board
 * 4) names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
 * 5) Information about subscription prices
 * 6) Information about how to submit articles
 * 7) Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
 * and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

for more specific information our WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, one good way to start is by using   the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there  to prose.  DGG ( talk ) 22:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Ok I will work on that.--Lorne McGregor (talk) 22:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:IshmIC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IshmIC.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:ISHMWORLD.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ISHMWORLD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File:ISHMCongresses.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ISHMCongresses.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)