User talk:Lornova~enwiki

"I live in Italy, I know" etc.
I assume good faith in you and I want to believe you. However, you need to provide an explanation for the multitude of results on "Lega Padania" in Google:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=el&q=%22Lega+Padania%22&btnG=Google+%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B6%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7&meta=

Etz Haim 01:52, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Point taken. I've noticed the commas, parentheses etc. between the results, but I've also seen "Lega Padania" as an integer. Also, note that Wikipedia's policies suggest that popular names, even if they are not official, are mentioned and sometimes preffered over the others. Etz Haim 02:08, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Lombard League
Firstly, I agree that I've never heard the Lega Nord called "Lega Padania". Secondly, I'm assuming that if you know "League of Lombard" to be an incorrect English rendition/translantion, then you can help us to come up with a way to distinguish the precursor to the Lega Nord from the historical Lombard Leagure of mediæval times. (My interst is that an American group wanted to model itself after the Lega Nord. The first name they came up with, Southern League, was the same as a baseball organization, so they changed it to League of the South. (It should be noted that, unlike the Lega Nord, this group a) has little popular support and b) is not regarded as a "legitimate" party by most observers, but it exists nonetheless and should be noted in Wikipedia.)


 * Hi, I simply seen that there is the article Lombard League that covers both the historical movement and the political party, then it's a better translation of the italian name "lega lombarda". The previous form "League of Lombardy" translated literally in Italian is "lega della lombardia". So, the form "Lombard League" is the correct one, in my opinion, for both the historical and modern movements. Lornova 17:43, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. Again, I always try to defer to knowledgeable natives.  While I find the Lega Nord to be an interesting movement in its own right, I have already explained my motives for wanting to learn more.

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lornova. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lornova~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)