User talk:Lorshepstone

March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fiction Writers Review has been reverted. Your edit here to Fiction Writers Review was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://theoverlookpress.blogspot.com/2008/10/maureen-freely-author-of-enlightenment.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Lorshepstone, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Speedy deletion nomination of Fiction Writers Review


A tag has been placed on Fiction Writers Review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unapproved article submission for AFC.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiction Writers Review (March 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ktr101&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

status

 * That the article was not approved is not by itself reason to remove it to mainspace, and therefore, as reviewing administrator, I did not delete it.  . Anyone may move an article into mainspace if they like, but of course it will then be judged by mainspace standards. Frankly, I would advise you to move it back,  which you can probably best do by resubmitting it.

Then you will have to remove the promotionalism -- it sounds like an advertisement for the magazine. You need to show importance and provide content by using references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. And make certain it does not copy any previously published material on your website or elsewhere.  DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fiction Writers Review


The article Fiction Writers Review has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unnotable organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)