User talk:Los2234

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Aaron Sorkin, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 05:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Aaron Sorkin
It's really important with biographies of living people to be accurate. Just stating a random website in your edit summary means nothing to anyone. How are we supposed to look that up? How are we to determine if it is a reliable source? You need to review these links before you make further changes to biographies. You just can run in and change the birthdate without solid information, that is retrievable with an inline citation per WP:CITET. Please read these links. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 00:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've done a google search on his birthday. Now this isn't a reliable method of getting information, but I've clicked through most of the first 50 hits, and they all say June 9, 1961.  If you want it to be June 6, 1961, you need to bring real reliable sources.  I'm not taking your word for it, sorry.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 00:14, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

BLP problems
As you have been previously advised above, please don't add or change information in biography articles without ensuring that you include a reliable source for confirmation (as you did at Jerry Bruckheimer). Any such additions can and will most likely be reverted, and continued issues may lead to your account being blocked. I have included a welcome message above which includes Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines, so please review it and ensure you are including reliable sources when editing articles. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As you continue to add unsourced personal info to biography despite warnings that this is against Wikipedia policy, I'm giving you a final warning that if you continue you will be blocked. Please ensure that any information you add includes a reliable source for verification. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly adding and changing information in biography articles without including sources despite multiple requests to stop.This edit, where you not only changed the information without a source, you actually added incorrect info contradicting the source already in place, was the proverbial "last straw". If you decide that you would like to edit collaboratively and abide by Wikipedia's BLP policy, you can request an unblock.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

review of block
I would like to be unblocked from editing WikiPedia. I understand what I'm blocked for, and I won't do it again. I am blocked for putting in info on living people that is either false or is without a source. I promise that when I make contributions to Wikipedia, that I will have a source(s).

--Los2234 (talk) 21:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Please insert your unblock request into the unblock template. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Andy Griffith, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 21:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless you want another indefinite block immediately, you need to stop making unsourced edits to biographies of people, living or dead. Sources go in the article, not in edit summaries. Read WP:CITE. Ancestry.com is not always a reliable source. Read WP:RS. And if another source already in the article conflicts with a source that you find, DISCUSS ON THE TALK PAGE to resolve the disputed information. This time I will assume good faith that you didn't quite realize that you were violating several policies. But with your edit history and block history, the good faith has reached its limit. Make the same mistake again and you will be blocked. Cresix (talk) 21:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)