User talk:LosPinosWebDesign

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LosPinosWebDesign/Gustav fristensky


A tag has been placed on User:LosPinosWebDesign/Gustav fristensky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pol430  talk to me  15:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice instead. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for this unfriendly opening, but you are evidently this company, and Wikipedia accounts must be for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them. Usernames that are names of companies or groups are not permitted. You are welcome to set up an individual account: you may use your real name or not, as you choose (see WP:REALNAME for some considerations).

I have deleted your subpage, because it was copied from http://www.gustavfristensky.com. Please read Copy-paste, and for more detail Copyrights. Wikipedia cannot accept previously-published material without a formal copyright release. Just asserting permission to use is not enough: (a) we cannot be certain that someone on the end of a wire is who they say or has the authority they claim, and (b) release to Wikipedia involves more than just permission to reproduce: our CC-BY-SA license permits any reader to copy, modify and re-use for any purpose including commercial, and it is necessary that the actual copyright holder understands and agrees to that.

The way to make a formal copyright release is explained at Donating copyrighted materials, but it is not often worth while, because material written for other purposes is usually too promotional in tone or otherwise unsuitable for an encyclopedia article.

Article subjects need WP:Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There is good advice at WP:Your first article on how to write an acceptable article.

Finally, I see that your company is in the SEO business. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind, and is very resistant to attempts to use it in that way. Even with a new, individual username, before editing on behalf of clients you should read:
 * Conflict of interest
 * Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest
 * Search engine optimization

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)