User talk:LottoMatic

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 10:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Now that is what I call a real answer. An answer that is meant to actually help the user understand what is going on. Thank you Deepfriedokra! Alexf‬ and Yamla... It IS possible to be polite. And it IS nice too. It doesn't even hurt! Try it sometimes! And if that's another reason... for... whatever so be it. If a little good manner lesson has such effect on you guys, it can only mean you really need more of it.


 * I have composed and posted my rationale. Perhaps this will help you to understand.--  Deep fried  okra    14:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed the aforementioned spam link that was masquerading as a reliable source.--  Deep fried  okra    14:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Usernames cannot be edited or changed in your preferences. If you tell the new username you would like to have(you may want to check Special:CentralAuth to see if your choice is available), I or another renamer can carry out the change. 331dot (talk) 20:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would be best if you did not attempt to directly edit about LottoMatic going forth. Per our conflict of interest policy however, asking other editors to make changes on the talkpage would be acceptable. With this in mind, are you still interested in ediitng? SQL Query me!  00:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

It's been now four days since my last edit here and I was just wondering if anyone had a chance to take a look at my request. An update would be appreciated. Thank you. LottoMatic (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Your request will be reviewed in due course, as administrators are volunteers just like you are. Please be patient.  I've unformatted your second request, as only one open request is needed at a time. Subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments. 331dot (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you 331dot. Learning something each and every time :-)

Well, I understand that the administrators are volunteers. What's hard to understand is this: an admin can jump in minutes after a link has been added to a wikipedia page but it takes weeks to deal with a case like this. Just wondering where were the admins when all those back-links were added to the tons of wikipedia page resources. And if you guys are telling me that you don't see all those links, and you're not aware of the real purpose for which those links are up there... well that's pretty much the same as calling me stupid.

I am also wondering if all this delay has to do with the recent interactions I had with wikimanagers(dot)com