User talk:Lou Sander/Archive5

Nezhat
whats up lou? I am the son of Jim Neal. i see that you have commented on Nezhat several times, as i have (for the safety of people, including my family, i erased it). i saw that you have written of nezhats "bullshit", but also that he is important. you have no idea who this man is. byPeppermintschnapps (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing
You do, indeed, have the power to warn disruptive editors if you feel it is appropriate - anyone can do this. To do so, you simply need to visit their Talk page and add a relevant warning. This is usually done by typing  , which expands to the full text of a default vandalism warning when you save the edit. Replace the '1' with a '2' for a second warning (within a month or so), and so on up to a maximum of 4. Should they continue to vandalise after a fourth warning, you, or anyone else, may report them at WP:AIV by following the instructions on that page, so that any necessary action can be taken. For further information, including when and where warnings are appropriate, see WP:Vandalism. Anaxial (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Hi Lou. I have replied to your question at my talkpage AIR corn (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Ann Coulter article
I am curious as to why you keep removing my section from the talk page of the Ann Coulter article. Regardless of your opinions, I am not breaking any rules by posting such a section. There happens to be a lot of sources that talk about the racist and insulting things this woman has said. This is a fact. I posted a legitimate inquiry on that talk page to create discussion that deals with the article. I'd appreciate if you explained your actions and NOT remove the section I created. If you know anything about wikipedia rules you cannot just remove someone's comment on a talk page if you don't like it, unless it violates some rule, which I am not doing. 76.114.42.231 (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * You are citing that rule wrong. I know the rule but it say NOTHING about expressing an opinion on a talk page, nor does any wikipedia rule. You can tell a person to stop being belligerent or offensive or crude, etc. but you CANNOT just erase what they say. 76.114.42.231 (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

For your information, please read WP:TPO. You are in direct violation of it and I ask you to cease and desist your actions. Even if I was breaking a rule, you cannot remove people's comments on a talk page unless it fits within a STRICT guideline, which my comments do not. I recommend remembering this rule for future use. You can't just go around removing people's comments. If I said something in the article that wasn't neutral or backed up by sources that's a different matter, but that's not what I did.76.114.42.231 (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:USSAeolus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:USSAeolus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:USSAeolus.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:USSAeolus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File:USSRankin.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:USSRankin.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:AHPTemporary.png
Thanks for uploading File:AHPTemporary.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — m o n o  00:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AHPTemporary.png
Thanks for uploading File:AHPTemporary.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — m o n o  00:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Is it weird venturing out of your little hellhole echo chamber? I imagine it must be very frustrating to someone who is used to the moderation on FR to have to actually deal with competing viewpoints, considering the inability of said viewpoints to actually stand up to any sort of assessment of coherence or logic. Anyway, I hope something from the real world sinks into your brain and that you might think twice about the ridiculous and abhorrent views that the vast majority of the people on the cesspool that is FreeRepublic hold. If not, whatever. I find it interesting and a little bit sad that your user page is dedicated to a ridiculously large amount of frivolous and self-aggrandizing history, but I don't find it at all surprising. Every person I've ever seen who frequents the haunts that you do has a vast over-estimation of the importance of themselves and their fringe, marginalized little thoughts. Cheers, and happy editing!

Keown
Hey, thanks I fixed the problem. Gigasolus (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:AHP AgeTryVerdana.png
Thanks for uploading File:AHP AgeTryVerdana.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AHP CharismaMatrix092210.png
You forgot to add a copyright tag to File:AHP CharismaMatrix092210.png that you uploaded recently. Please add one otherwise the image may be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 03:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)