User talk:LoudSecret123

August 2021
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:2601:193:8201:BA40:71DC:4C3C:B92E:4FF8. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * As I already mentioned above, personal attacks are not permitted. "Telling another editor to "get stuffed" is not appropriate. Grayfell (talk) 10:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Cuh this ain't a personal attack. If anyone is attacking anyone, then you're attacking the fat fetish community.

Original research
Regarding your edit summary:
 * Grey. I know this is unsourced, because there is no source. This wiki is the main information for Fat Fetishism on the internet meaning it is valuable and important. Fat fetisism is taboo on a societal standard, and therefore information is scarce and public understanding is minimal. Sources don't exist because it people don't think differently of fat fetishism then no sources will be made. Fat fetisism is apart of people sexuality. I will fight for that truth, no matter how many edits of this.

This is not how Wikipedia works. Information must be supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia doesn't publish original research. Further, Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy. The place to discuss this further is Talk:Fat fetishism. Because you are edit warring, I will also leave a template warning you about this. Please be aware that edit waring can lead to blocks, or page protection, or both. It is not an appropriate way to resolve this dispute. Grayfell (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Fat fetishism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 10:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 10:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)