User talk:Loudes13

Image:5hp_clear_background.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:5hp_clear_background.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 22:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Color-logo-big.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Color-logo-big.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 21:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Illinois doberman rescue
A tag has been placed on Illinois doberman rescue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nsevs •  Talk  15:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Illinois doberman rescue
A tag has been placed on Illinois doberman rescue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nsevs •  Talk  16:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply to your comment on my talk page
While a noble and human effort, Wikipedia has notability criteria that governs inclusion into this encyclopedia. Unless there is something uniquely notable about this rescue group over most others, please provide verifiable, reliable sources which substantiate this fact. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, but there are many others like it. If San Francisco SPCA can have an article, why can's IDR? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_SPCA --Loudes13 (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It's notability is described in the first paragraph. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, what about The Humane Society of Allen County? I could go on all day. There are hundreds of similar articles. Please do not delete it.--Loudes13 (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mining boy without hands.jpg
Hi Loudes13!

We thank you for uploading Image:Mining boy without hands.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CynthiaMcKinney.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CynthiaMcKinney.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

For the record, I've marked this for speedy deletion, just as I did your previous self-created political advertisement above. Inserting personal political advocacy into the encyclopedia is not acceptable under any circumstances - not only does it directly violate wikipedia's NPOV policy, but political campaigning – or even the appearance of political campaigning – for US political candidates could jeopardize the Foundation's nonprofit status. If you do so again, I will seek to have you blocked until after the election as a preventive measure. Don't do it. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning about political images
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive uploads. The next time you upload an inappropriate image, such as Image:CynthiaBumperSticker.jpg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not upload political campaign images for any other reason other than as a visual aid for an article of Wikipedia (and in those cases, the appropriate images are usually not self-created). Political commentary is tolerated in certain amounts on your userpage but images that attack another living person as the aforementioned image did are not tolerated. Please also note that Wikipedia is not a webhoster for you to store your images. There are multiple free services for this, see Image hosting. Regards  So Why  06:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Allen skillicorn WAG ice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Allen skillicorn WAG ice.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dr Eric Wallce.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dr Eric Wallce.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Andrzejewski
A tag has been placed on Adam Andrzejewski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dismas |(talk) 02:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the article was already deleted once back on 2 June 2009 and the content of this article is not significantly different from the previous version. Dismas |(talk) 02:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This article meets the criteria. Was this done because the editors bias against Republicans? --Loudes13 (talk) 16:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * In response to your comment on my talk page: On the contrary, I am from Illinois. I live in Vermont now, yeah.  But I'm from IL.  Dismas |(talk) 20:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Andrzejewski
A tag has been placed on Adam Andrzejewski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Adam Andrzejewski
An article that you have been involved in editing, Adam Andrzejewski, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dismas |(talk) 17:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review
No, having the same article posted over again would not indicate that someone is notable. After all, the reposting could be done by a single individual with a mission and a single purpose account.

At the top of the AFD discussion, it says not to modify the discussion once it is closed. The decision was to delete the Adam Andrzejewski article. If you'd like to discuss it more, you can put the article up for review at deletion review.

If you have any questions for me, after all I did put it up for deletion and had the article speedied in the past, you can reach me on my talk page. I'll be happy to answer any questions you have (if I can) about notability and such. I really have nothing against Andrzejewski or the Republicans (since you suggested that there was some bias against the party on WP), I just don't believe he's notable... yet. Dismas |(talk) 19:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I cannot look up who created previous versions of the article. I'm not an admin.  I'm just a user like you.  All I can see is what you can see here.


 * Just because you hear about him every day on the radio does not make him notable. If you had multiple independent sources, then he'd be notable.  From what I recall, all you had to offer were local political blogs.  I don't recall you trying to offer coverage in, for example, The Doings, the Sun Times or the Trib.  Those could have easily satisfied the claims of notability.  Did you read WP:POLITICIAN?  It spells out the criteria for notability for politicians.  Barring that, he might have even passed the general notability guidelines if, like I said, he had articles written about him in major publications.  Note, just a mention of him attending some event doesn't count as coverage.  Having an article chiefly about him would though.


 * And it doesn't matter if I'm not in Illinois, even though I am from Hinsdale. A local person may seem notable to a local resident but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are notable enough for inclusion in WP.  The applicable policies were pointed out to you several times both on your own talk page as well as in the deletion discussion.


 * I went through Google News trying to find mentions of him. I found only 41 entries and none of them, as I recall, really focused on Andrzejewski.  They mentioned him, surely, but there wasn't really any significant coverage.  Dismas |(talk) 21:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Husqvarna SM610.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Husqvarna SM610.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Allen Skillicorn
I have nominated Allen Skillicorn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Allen Skillicorn. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drdisque (talk) 04:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

google Allen Skillicorn and you will find hundreds of racing results. Clearly relevant. --Loudes13 (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:2007 champ.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2007 champ.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Allen SpecMiata Iowa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Allen SpecMiata Iowa.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mmvpanel14.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mmvpanel14.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Original ac crane drive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Original ac crane drive.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shawn G. Chittle (left) and DJ Grand Wizzard Theodore.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shawn G. Chittle (left) and DJ Grand Wizzard Theodore.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)