User talk:LouisaCatherineAdams

Welcome!
Hi LouisaCatherineAdams! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  20:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jo Jorgensen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 03:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jennie Eisenhower, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 12:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at David Eisenhower, you may be blocked from editing. If you know, why do it? Kleuske (talk) 12:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Images
Regarding your request and attempts at Doria Palmieri, see Images to know how to upload images. Please read Image_use_policy; something found on a google search can't be used here, without taking care of appropriate copyright issues. Hemanthah (talk) 12:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hunter Biden. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Hunter Biden have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 01:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Stacey Abrams, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Patti Davis. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ron Reagan. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

James Madison Sr.
I find this source: https://montpelierdescendants.org/2021/02/12/bettyekearse/ very dubious. It's a podcast with no citations and the group is of an unknown authority. Near as I can tell, the relationship is based on a slave's surname and word-of-mouth history. Didn't many slaves take on their 'master's' surname? I undid as I found the source unreliable. Personally, I would find an African-American descendant of a slave-holding president unsurprising and interesting. However, a more reliable source is needed. I would think that DNA testing would provide more than sufficient evidence to establish relationship. According to Amazon reviewers, the white descendant of Madison refused to take a DNA test. Shame on him. I think there is someone who claims JFK illegitimately fathered him; lots of closeting going on in this world. BTW: is it "Corren" or "Corinne"? Adakiko (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Lunden Roberts moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lunden Roberts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to show notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion and sources
Most people here would be more than willing to support you. If your edits were reverted, asking for help on their talk page might help to get your content replace. If it's more than a simple question, or a complex issue, you might start a discussion on the article's talk page. Use Help:Notifications so they and others who might be interested so they are aware of your discussion. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Remember to WP:INDENT and sign your talk.

Using H:THANK to say thank you to others for helping (such as this) lets them know you have read and, maybe, appreciate their post.

You might want to look at WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources which is a sub-page to WP:Reliable sources. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please learn about Wikipedia
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential pets. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please heed the advice of the other editors who have commented on this talk page and learn what is appropriate and helpful for Wikipedia. - Special-T (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Perennial sources
Commonly used sources and their acceptability as RS can be found here: wp:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Redirect links to wp:PAGESIX, wp:NYPOST, and wp:DAILYMAIL. Adakiko (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * And you're still using sources like the Daily Mail. Please slow down and use high-quality sources.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Please learn WP policies & guidelines
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Nearly all of your edits have to be reverted or cleaned up by other editors. Most recently because of unreliable sources and/or uncited claims (some about living people WP:BLP). You have been asked many times but continue to make these inappropriate edits. - Special-T (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Special-T (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:BLP problems
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. You changed a sentence in the Taylor Swift article to a statement that did not match the ref. - Special-T (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Special-T (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Martha Parke Custis


The article Martha Parke Custis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability isn't inherited, and subject doesn't appear to be known for anything of own merit (i.e. outside of family affiliations), failing WP:BIO. Most or all sources discussing this person (aside from a findagrave.com listing) also seem to be closely affiliated with her mother Martha Washington and/or stepfather George Washington, which would mean they don't count as independent coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Martha Parke Custis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martha Parke Custis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Martha Parke Custis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)