User talk:Louisdicenzo

Help me!
Please help me with...starting a biography page for a person who is living.

Louis DiCenzo Louisdicenzo (talk) 00:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Louisdicenzo (talk) 00:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If there are numerous sources such as news, let me know and I can start giving you some help about starting one. SwisterTwister   talk  00:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...there are about 10 footnotes in this person's bio.

Louisdicenzo (talk) 05:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * First of all, I'm watching this so there's no need to retag it as needing help; next, if you would list them all here (remember, no press releases, social media, interviews or trivial passing mentions). SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Am I correct in responding like this...

1 Indian Iron Eyes Cody    http://jhproject.org/2014/12/jhp-paddle-8-auction-features-iron-eyes-cody-by-ron-jaffe/ 2 How I Met Your Mother    http://time.com/44702/how-i-met-your-mother-finale-review/ 3 How I Met Your Mother    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/how-nbc-finished-season-at-705751 4 How I Met Your Mother    http://www.people.com/people/mobile/article/0,,20801302,00.html 5 Mad Men                  http://www.vulture.com/2013/06/mad-men-guide-to-being-a-father.html 6 Rules of Engagement      http://becksmithhollywood.com/2011/10/wendi-mclendon-covey-talks-bridesmaids-2-prospects-rules-of-   engagement/ 7 CSI Crime Scene Investigation  http://www.csifiles.com/content/2012/04/csi-first-look-dune-gloom/ 8 NCSI                     http://www.tvgoodness.com/2011/12/13/tinas-2011-tv-goodness-all-stars-ncis-michael-weatherly/ 9 NCSI                     http://www.tvgoodness.com/2012/05/02/ncis-playing-with-fire/ 10 CBS                     http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2014/06/20/several-cbs-actors-to-receive-walk-of-fame-stars/

Also, will the Save Page button allow me to save my edits and come back another time and continue working on it?

Louisdicenzo (talk) 06:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes and yes. Also make sure this is not retagged as needing help like shown above before I responded, as I'm watching this and will reply again. SwisterTwister   talk  06:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ron jaffe


The article Ron jaffe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. shoy (reactions) 14:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Page Question
Last night I saw that the Ron Jaffe page was deleted because it had not sources noted. I posted the page again with the sources and now I am unable to find it. Can you tell me if it still exists and if so, where I can find it? Also, I would like to add two photos to the page. Am I able to do so within the next week?

Louisdicenzo (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Louisdicenzo (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I have checked the editing history of this account, including its deleted edits, and it never posted the article again after it was deleted. Unless you did it when you were not logged into this account, you must have made some mistake such as not clicking "Save page" when you had posted it. However, I have restored the deleted article and moved it to Draft:Ron Jaffe, to give you a chance to make improvements, including adding sources. When you have done that, you can submit it for review by clicking the "Submit your draft for review" button, and a reviewer will either decide that it's suitable to be launched back as an article or else tell you why it is not suitable, to give you another chance to work on it.


 * My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make (which you will, because we all do) will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. However, if you do decide to carry on working on this draft, rather than leaving it and doing other editing, I wish you success with it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you JamesBWatson for reposting the page and your detailed feedback, which answered a lot of my questions. I very much appreciate it. I have submitted the article for review and look forward to the response.

Louisdicenzo (talk) 06:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Louisdicenzo (talk) 06:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see Help:Referencing_for_beginners and, then, afterwards please add all additional amounts of in-depth third-party news. Remember, no press releases, interviews, trivial passing mentions or social media. SwisterTwister   talk  06:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * This wasn't a question, he's just thanking ., in the future please either directly mention the user you want to communicate with (using the template), or posting on their talkpage. Or request help from that user by using . You can use  to show your appreciation. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 07:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Jaffe (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Jaffe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ron_Jaffe Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaMona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ron_Jaffe reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Rejection of Ron Jaffe Page
Please help me with... The page was rejected because "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." I'm not sure what that means as the sources are Time, Hollywood Reporter, People, CBS. Can I get a little more information on why it was rejected? Thank you. Louisdicenzo (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Louisdicenzo (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * None of the sources actually mention Ron Jaffe. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Photo Credits
I'm having a little trouble understanding what is a reliable reference for as photographer's work. I was told that the photo credits do count as references, but are not particularly good references. The references I noted are from reputable magazines and websites. What specifically should I use? Thank you. Louisdicenzo (talk) 05:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Each of these links have photos and Ron Jaffe has a credit on each of the pages. Does it count as a reference for Wikipedia? If they are not, what should I use to show and reference his work?

Also, I am having some trouble with the link to reference number 6. If I can't find out why this link will not work I will delete that one, use only nine.

Thanks.

Louisdicenzo (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Louisdicenzo (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, so the short answer to your question is "yes, they count as references." However, they are not particularly good references. References fall into one of three (very general) categories:
 * Unreliable sources: these are things like blogs, forums, Facebook, IMDb, etc, that are either user-generated or of questionable reliability. If some guy with an opinion writes something on the internet, it's generally not acceptable.
 * PRIMARY sources: these are sources that are directly connected to the subject. Often this is the subject's own website, but interviews also fall into this category. They are discouraged, mainly because it is the subject talking about themselves and they could be lying (so it's easier to just not use the information).
 * Independent reliable sources. These are articles from newspapers, magazines, and reputable websites. These references are what Wikipedia is built on - good sources of information and a place where someone can potentially learn more about a subject. There are two types of reliable source
 * Name drops/passing mentions: these are sources that do little more than mention the subject or give their name in a list (such as the Top 100 Widget Makers). Since they are reliable sources, they can be used to verify the facts on the page, but don't actually demonstrate notability.
 * In-depth sources: references that talk about the subject from a reliable source show that someone has "taken note" of the subject. If there is no in-depth coverage of a subject, they fail the Golden Rule and generally are not given a Wikipedia entry.
 * Your CBS sources are essentially a lot of name drops, but you have no good in-depth sources. You must get some for this draft to be even borderline acceptable.
 * In short - you need more references. It's better to have less information that is backed up by really good references than a huge page that is mostly fluff. In other words, if you can't find a source to corroborate a sentence on your draft, you should remove it. Not every source has to be a detailed description of Jaffe's life, but the majority should be. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Ron Jaffe concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ron Jaffe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ron Jaffe Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ron Jaffe Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kristen Bell and Amanda Seyfreid.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kristen Bell and Amanda Seyfreid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Explosion CSI New York.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Explosion CSI New York.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Alaina Hoolihan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alaina Hoolihan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Iron Eyes Cody.jpg
 * File:James Woods.jpg
 * File:SchwarzeneggerNixonHope.jpg
 * File:Shelly Hack.jpg

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Photo of Kristen Bell and Amanda Seyfreid.jpg


The file File:Photo of Kristen Bell and Amanda Seyfreid.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NFCC. The fact that Ron Jaffe photographed actors is decribed perfectly fine with text."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 11:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Photo of Iron Eyes Cody.jpg


The file File:Photo of Iron Eyes Cody.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: WP:NFCC. The fact that Ron Jaffe photographed Iron Eyes Cody is adequately described with text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo of Iron Eyes Cody.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo of Kristen Bell and Amanda Seyfreid.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Arnold Schwarzenegger Richard Nixon Bob Hope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion pending for File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg
Hello, Louisdicenzo. Some time ago, a file you uploaded &mdash; File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg &mdash; was tagged with OTRS pending, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.


 * If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.


 * If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Ron Jaffe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)