User talk:Louise J Tanner

December 2014
Hello, I'm Fylbecatulous. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lumos (charity) because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. While I understand your desire to reflect your ethos, our articles have to remain factual and not in essay or promotional form. You are certainly allowed to have references and external links to direct interested readers to your websites for the more heartfelt mission information you wish to convey. All the best, Fylbecatulous talk 14:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi User: Fylbecatulous Thanks for your comments, I'm aware of the terms and conditions on Wikipedia, however much of the information on the page currently is completely factually incorrect. The chair of the charity is wrong, the trustees are named incorrectly and the mission and background of the charity is also wrong. I will take out any links to our website throughout the text but request that you allow me to make edits that actually reflect the organisation so that the page is up to date and not full of historical content. Many thanks 195.99.219.120 (talk) 11:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC) User:Louise J Tanner 11:07, 04 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your gracious response to my reversion. I do not alter text back to an earlier version but once. To do otherwise is considered edit warring and I am a peaceful editor. I have added a few more specific categories (they actually help readers and editors locate an article by subject matter). I have also added two Wiki Project banners on the talk page. The Project for the United Kingdon seems to be currently active. This edit by an IP was actually good for the factual stance required by Wikipedia:, except you really need sources besides your organisation's own material; such as have appeared in unbiased journals, newspapers or media that have been written objectively about your NGO. So I leave two issue tags; most articles have them. Other editors are free to remove them if they find the article to be written well enough. I edit and watch many cat articles and belong to the WikiProject Cats. We cat lovers can be quite effervecent with praise for a breed or colour along with many cute pet pictures added to articles. Hence our articles end up with many issue templates. I wish you kind regards.   Fylbecatulous talk 15:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)