User talk:Louisvarley

Your edits regarding National Pouched Rat Society
Please understand that regardless of your username, you have a direct conflict of interest in regards to National Pouched Rat Society. You need to read and abide by our conflict of interest guideline. Further, if you are in any way, shape, or form being compensated for your edits on behalf of the National Pouched Rat Society, you must declare this. If this is the case, please carefully read and abide by WP:PAID. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

IMPORTANT: Paid Editing
Hello Louisvarley. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Louisvarley. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Pouched Rat Society (May 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Pouched Rat Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe deckertalk 04:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:National Pouched Rat Society


Hello, Louisvarley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Pouched Rat Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 03:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)