User talk:Loup and Law

Komeito
Would you mind taking part in Komeito’s Talk? Thank you for participating in the discussion on the Japanese version of the Komeito page before this. Even on the English version of the page, the discussion on the position of the party has not progressed.

There is also an article by a university professor who rates the Komeito as "centre-left". If the ratings are distributed from "centre-left" to "right-wing", it would not be appropriate to simply write "centre-right". Littlelessleast (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok!--Loup and Law (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for taking part in the discussion. Then I have one question, could you answer it if you like? Regarding the following Japanese article, this sentence is intended to promote security policy when a center-left political party is involved, and the Komeito party is classified and treated as the same center-left political party as the Social Democratic Party of Japan. Is that right? I translated it as "originally" mechanically because there was “本来”.

https://diamond.jp/articles/amp/70206?page=3&skin=amp&

文中に“本来”と言う語があったため”originally”と機械的に訳出しましたが、この文の書かれた2015年時点の評価として中道左派政党として自社さ連立における社会党と同列の役割を果たしているとの趣旨と読み取りました(=中道左派は過去ではなく最近の評価)が Loup and Law さんはどうお考えでしょう？アドバイス頂けると嬉しいです. Littlelessleast (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I read it as writing about the current Komeito, I have no objection.--Loup and Law (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. In that case, I think the most appropriate political position of the Komeito infobox is "Centre to centre-right " as I suggested. What do you think? I'm glad if you come to the Komeito’s talk page again.

삭은사과 probably mistake the article as a reputation for the past Komeito because I used the word "originally" to translate the article.

삭은사과さんはきっと私が ”originally” という訳語を使ったため、現在ではなく過去の公明党を評価する記事だと勘違いしたのでしょう. もう一度talk に来て議論に加わってもらえると嬉しいです. 中道左派、中道、中道右派、右翼と評価が分かれているようなので私は、”中道-中道右派” (Centre to centre-right) とした上で中道左派、右翼と評価されることもあるとするのが最適だと考えますがLoup and Law さんはどうお考えでしょうか.

Littlelessleast (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

mediabiasfactcheck as a source
Hi Loup and Law. I noticed that you recently used mediabiasfactcheck .com as a source in Rodong Sinmun. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * OK! Thank you for teaching me.--Loup and Law (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberal Democratic Party (Japan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reiwa Shinsengumi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)