User talk:Louwsconsult

Blocked
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Louwsconsult (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

41.150.175.210 (talk) 03:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Wait a second. Your username is "Louwsconsult" and you attempted to add "Pierre Johan Louw I" (the owner of Louw's Consult Legal) to Louw. Isn't that wp:PROMOTION? Is that "Academic Analysis of prominent contemparary South African Case Law and nothing else"? It looks like a clear case of self-promotion. Do you intend to continue such editing if unblocked? What do you intend to change if unblocked?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)