User talk:Lovecomic

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ethan Van Sciver has been reverted. Your edit here to Ethan Van Sciver was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/c/ComicArtistProSecrets) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vox Day, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for updating the URL for the subject's YouTube channel. That was a legitimate change, and the "bot" that reverted it made a mistake in doing so. However, there were problems with the rest of your edits. Your removal of information with cited sources for it, replacing it with your own point of view, was not appropriate. In addition, you changed the city where he lives, which might be helpful, if true, but you gave no proof of it. The source that we already cited clearly states he lived in Orlando at that time, so the way you left it was simply false. If you have a reliable source that identifies New Jersey as his current home, you are welcome to add or update that information. Please follow the links in this message, and familiarize yourself with these important Wikipedia requirements. Magic9Ball (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Ethan Van Sciver, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn talk  11:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Not sure why the edit was undone, when the both article that was cited clearly stated the edits. Lovecomic (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Comicsgate. ''You've had multiple warnings for various edits. And you lead doesn't reflect the sources in the body of the text. It is what it was.'' Doug Weller  talk 13:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 12:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * If possible can you please cite my interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. The goal of wikipedia is for the contribute and cite sources and help correct information for the readers. My goal is to not vandalize or disrupt. Only to contribute and add to this wonderful source of wikipedia. Lovecomic (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comicsgate is your interest. Doug Weller  talk 13:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Mr Weller, my interest is solely to help provide proper information for readers. The sources I posted are 100% verifiable and fall under the editing and spirit of the wikipedia foundation. Lovecomic (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * So what? The article is under discretionary sanctions and you are heading towards a topic ban if you continue. Not by me as I reverted you but I can ask for one. Doug Weller  talk 13:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * And verifiable is necessary but never sufficient. Doug Weller  talk 13:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what else to do, I follow wiki's rules, cite verifiable source, and contribute in a non bias way and still it's viewed as incorrect. Thank you Mr Weller for your time and unbiased efforts. Lovecomic (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * But your edits are biased. Go to the article talk page and defend them Doug Weller  talk 14:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how they're bias, but I'll just leave it as is. Again thank you Mr Weller for taking your time to look into this. Well wishes. Lovecomic (talk) 14:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Generalrelative (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Is there some reason why my correction to the comicsgate wiki page was reverted? What is listed is not an accurate description of what Comics Gate is. Lovecomic (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)