User talk:Loversquash

Reverting changes
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jansher Khan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Spintendo  12:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Conflict of interest
Hello, Loversquash. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Jansher Khan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spintendo 12:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:331dot may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  17:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Spintendo.  General Ization Talk  17:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

WP:CIR
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Assuming good faith, yes, you did "use the wrong way" (repeatedly, even after multiple warnings). I suspect that the larger problem is that your skill with the English language, as both a writer and as a reader, is very low.  Have you considered editing the version of Wikipedia written in your native language (assuming that it is not English)?  Look here for a complete list.  General Ization  Talk  01:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)