User talk:Lovestar Horatio

Dvmarquit, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome
Hello, Dvmarquit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created was Deborah Marquit, which appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Mabalu (talk) 11:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deborah Marquit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Klein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Deborah Marquit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Marquit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deborah Marquit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 10:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Deborah Marquit. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 04:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 04:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your username and conflict of interest
Hi,

I notice that you've been editing under Dvmarquit since 2015, and only contributing to the Deborah Marquit article. While all contributions are appreciated, I would like to remind you that editing about yourself or your employer is strongly discouraged, even in good faith. If your subject is notable enough, don't worry, other will improve the article!

Moreover, usernames should not represent a company, so I strongly suggest you change your username at Changing username/Simple if you're not Ms Marquit herself. -- Luk  talk 08:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi luk, Thank you I have followed your recommendation. How do I un-remove the contents that inappropriately removed by another user? The contents were indeed verified with proper accreditations and I was in the midst of making corrections when he cut off the page and removed most of the contents. Although it may seem like the rules were not followed, they are being very well followed! I do not think he has the knowledge of fashion to be equipped to make this judgment call. Please advise, Thank you.--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 16:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please declare relationship
What is your relationship with Deborah Marquit? Toddst1 (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)


 * no relation--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Why did you say you had a conflict of interest in this request?
 * Why did you change your user name from "Dvmarquit" while denying that you have any connection to Marquit? Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Deborah Marquit. Toddst1 (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * There were items removed from this page that infact were properly sourced and removed by you. Kindly direct me by link to the original text that was removed. Thx --Lovestar Horatio (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What was your source for her date of birth you added? Toddst1 (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

This information was already previously on the wikipedia page Deborah Marquit, and you removed it, it was not added by me, it was already there. If you  google Deborah Marquit, the previous wikipedia information propagates the page...Thank you.--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

'''This was an INVENTION, not just a mention. You have misinterpreted and judged the article without asking or knowing anything about the topic. This goes against the rules of Wikipedia. READ THE NY TIMES ARTICLE CITED.'''--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Deborah Marquit was the very first designer to come up with the idea of creating bras and underwear during a time when women's underwear that was sold in dept stores was black, white and beige utilitarian garment...and it is a significant point in fashion history, her invention is the dayglo /neon/ fluorescent bra as quoted here in the New York Times article. It seems that you are looking to take down something that is stated as proof in this article along with other information that verifies Deborah Marquit as the first designer who created lingerie meant to be worn as clothing. This was an ironic and feminist fashion statement and was quite shocking at the time (1984) It was since then that many other lingerie brands came to be, however, she was the first to do fashion in lingerie...: NEW YORK TIMES AUTHOR Amy Spindler: https://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/17/style/patterns-117390.html Can you please READ the article and see that you removed the information cited in the article. This is not just a mention. It was a specific historical event in fashion. No other brand or designer ever made anything like it before 1984, including other fabrications that were not used in intimate apparel before then, such as PVC vinyl that she was commissioned to create for Madonna on many occasions and for the film Director Tim Burton. Her underwear was also worn under the brand Ghost, fashion-show in the 7th on 6th venue, on Kate Moss, and no one had ever seen dayglo underwear before that. CAN YOU PLEASE PUT BACK THE material that was already written. Are there not rules for removing content such as you did with obvious proof in the article? Do you have any fashion knowledge? Thank you.--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC) --Lovestar Horatio (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are rules about removing content - especially promotional content and self-promotional content, just as there are rules for adding content.  I know and have followed these rules very carefully.
 * While you say you have no connection to the subject of this article, your actions say otherwise quite strongly.  I strongly advise you to discuss any changes you would like to see made to that article on the article's talk page.  Better yet, edit a different topic where there is no conflict.  Toddst1 (talk) 17:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

You have removed facts and not promotional material. This is an invention as stated below. Your removal is considered vandalism by Wikipedia terms. --Lovestar Horatio (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * If you think my edits are vandalizm, then report me to the Administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard. However, I will do what I can to prevent you from using Wikipedia for promoting Deborah Marquit or anyone else.  Toddst1 (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions.--Lovestar Horatio (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)