User talk:LovingerJ

January 2016
Hello, I'm DatGuy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Finabio with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fina Biosolutions LLC


A tag has been placed on Fina Biosolutions LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Note that you should not create multiple articles with the same content. If there are alternative names, use #redirect article title. Note that if you create an article directly rather than in a draft space, it will be assessed immediately, I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You told us only about what the company sells, which is promotional. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I note that you have claimed not to have a conflict of interest. Your article is not the worse I've seen, and if you want to try again, I'll post the deleted text to a user subpage for you to work on, just let me know. I suggest that you look at some other articles to get an idea of layout and referencing.

Note that I will be going on holiday in a couple of days (I'll leave a message on my talk page). If you miss that boat, you will need to post a request for a userfied version at requests for undeletion Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)