User talk:Lovis

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Lovis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Artificial intelligence, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

- Hello GermanJoe, I am not so used to edit Wikipedia as you can see. This is also why I asked the page to be reviewed. I am very involved in this field in medicine, trying to build a proper environment to have Big Data and AI leverage medicine, and thought it could be useful to add this point in the medicine section. Yes, it is a self citation. I didn't know that it required to add something special. I don't think it is buzzwords or fuzzy. It is actually an lot of important elements. Maybe, you should have a look on the paper. Thank you and regards Christian


 * Hello Lovis, encyclopedic articles should present established knowledge that has already been widely discussed and accepted in the academic community. Secondly, articles should focus on providing verifiable facts - "trying to build a proper environment to have Big Data and AI leverage medicine" is an external goal and should not be advocated here. Your contributions as topic expert are appreciated, but you should try to base such contributions on independent 3rd-party sources and focus on providing "dry" facts. Encyclopedic articles and journals are written in a fairly different tone - try to avoid any phrases that could be seen as subjective, vague, or a personal assessment. If you can't find a 3rd-party source for content, it would be better to suggest occasional usages of your own work in edit requests on article talk. Hope these tips are helpful. GermanJoe (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello GermanJoe, Thank you very much. I will prepare something and submit it you before. Lovis (talk) 20:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)